netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, fw@strlen.de
Subject: [PATCH net 2/3] netfilter: nat: restore default DNAT behavior
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 00:38:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240214233818.7946-3-pablo@netfilter.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240214233818.7946-1-pablo@netfilter.org>

From: Kyle Swenson <kyle.swenson@est.tech>

When a DNAT rule is configured via iptables with different port ranges,

iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -d 10.0.0.2 -m tcp --dport 32000:32010
-j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.0.10:21000-21010

we seem to be DNATing to some random port on the LAN side. While this is
expected if --random is passed to the iptables command, it is not
expected without passing --random.  The expected behavior (and the
observed behavior prior to the commit in the "Fixes" tag) is the traffic
will be DNAT'd to 192.168.0.10:21000 unless there is a tuple collision
with that destination.  In that case, we expect the traffic to be
instead DNAT'd to 192.168.0.10:21001, so on so forth until the end of
the range.

This patch intends to restore the behavior observed prior to the "Fixes"
tag.

Fixes: 6ed5943f8735 ("netfilter: nat: remove l4 protocol port rovers")
Signed-off-by: Kyle Swenson <kyle.swenson@est.tech>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
---
 net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c
index c3d7ecbc777c..016c816d91cb 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c
@@ -551,8 +551,11 @@ static void nf_nat_l4proto_unique_tuple(struct nf_conntrack_tuple *tuple,
 find_free_id:
 	if (range->flags & NF_NAT_RANGE_PROTO_OFFSET)
 		off = (ntohs(*keyptr) - ntohs(range->base_proto.all));
-	else
+	else if ((range->flags & NF_NAT_RANGE_PROTO_RANDOM_ALL) ||
+		 maniptype != NF_NAT_MANIP_DST)
 		off = get_random_u16();
+	else
+		off = 0;
 
 	attempts = range_size;
 	if (attempts > NF_NAT_MAX_ATTEMPTS)
-- 
2.30.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-02-14 23:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-14 23:38 [PATCH net 0/3] Netfilter fixes for net Pablo Neira Ayuso
2024-02-14 23:38 ` [PATCH net 1/3] netfilter: nft_set_pipapo: fix missing : in kdoc Pablo Neira Ayuso
2024-02-15 12:00   ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2024-02-14 23:38 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2024-02-14 23:38 ` [PATCH net 3/3] netfilter: nf_tables: fix bidirectional offload regression Pablo Neira Ayuso

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240214233818.7946-3-pablo@netfilter.org \
    --to=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).