From: wenxu <wenxu@ucloud.cn>
To: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Cc: jiri@resnulli.us, pablo@netfilter.org, fw@strlen.de,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
John Hurley <john.hurley@netronome.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 5/6] flow_offload: support get flow_block immediately
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2019 21:09:03 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55850b13-991f-97bd-b452-efacd0f39aa4@ucloud.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bac5c6a5-8a1b-ee74-988b-6c2a71885761@ucloud.cn>
在 2019/8/2 18:45, wenxu 写道:
> On 8/2/2019 7:11 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 11:03:46 +0800, wenxu@ucloud.cn wrote:
>>> From: wenxu <wenxu@ucloud.cn>
>>>
>>> The new flow-indr-block can't get the tcf_block
>>> directly. It provide a callback list to find the flow_block immediately
>>> when the device register and contain a ingress block.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: wenxu <wenxu@ucloud.cn>
>> First of all thanks for splitting the series up into more patches,
>> it is easier to follow the logic now!
>>
>>> @@ -328,6 +348,7 @@ struct flow_indr_block_dev {
>>>
>>> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&indr_dev->cb_list);
>>> indr_dev->dev = dev;
>>> + flow_get_default_block(indr_dev);
>>> if (rhashtable_insert_fast(&indr_setup_block_ht, &indr_dev->ht_node,
>>> flow_indr_setup_block_ht_params)) {
>>> kfree(indr_dev);
>> I wonder if it's still practical to keep the block information in the
>> indr_dev structure at all. The way this used to work was:
>>
>>
>> [hash table of devices] --------------
>> | | netdev |
>> | | refcnt |
>> indir_dev[tun0]| ------ | cached block | ---- [ TC block ]
>> | | callbacks | .
>> | -------------- \__ [cb, cb_priv, cb_ident]
>> | [cb, cb_priv, cb_ident]
>> | --------------
>> | | netdev |
>> | | refcnt |
>> indir_dev[tun1]| ------ | cached block | ---- [ TC block ]
>> | | callbacks |.
>> ----------------- -------------- \__ [cb, cb_priv, cb_ident]
>> [cb, cb_priv, cb_ident]
>>
>>
>> In the example above we have two tunnels tun0 and tun1, each one has a
>> indr_dev structure allocated, and for each one of them two drivers
>> registered for callbacks (hence the callbacks list has two entries).
>>
>> We used to cache the TC block in the indr_dev structure, but now that
>> there are multiple subsytems using the indr_dev we either have to have
>> a list of cached blocks (with entries for each subsystem) or just always
>> iterate over the subsystems :(
>>
>> After all the same device may have both a TC block and a NFT block.
>>
>> I think always iterating would be easier:
>>
>> The indr_dev struct would no longer have the block pointer, instead
>> when new driver registers for the callback instead of:
>>
>> if (indr_dev->ing_cmd_cb)
>> indr_dev->ing_cmd_cb(indr_dev->dev, indr_dev->flow_block,
>> indr_block_cb->cb, indr_block_cb->cb_priv,
>> FLOW_BLOCK_BIND);
>>
>> We'd have something like the loop in flow_get_default_block():
>>
>> for each (subsystem)
>> subsystem->handle_new_indir_cb(indr_dev, cb);
>>
>> And then per-subsystem logic would actually call the cb. Or:
>>
>> for each (subsystem)
>> block = get_default_block(indir_dev)
>> indr_dev->ing_cmd_cb(...)
> nft dev chian is also based on register_netdevice_notifier, So for unregister case,
>
> the basechian(block) of nft maybe delete before the __tc_indr_block_cb_unregister. is right?
>
> So maybe we can cache the block as a list of all the subsystem in indr_dev ?
when the device is unregister the nft netdev chain related to this device will also be delete through netdevice_notifier
. So for unregister case,the basechian(block) of nft maybe delete before the __tc_indr_block_cb_unregister.
cache for the block is not work because the chain already be delete and free. Maybe it improve the prio of
rep_netdev_event can help this?
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-02 13:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-01 3:03 [PATCH net-next v5 0/6] flow_offload: add indr-block in nf_table_offload wenxu
2019-08-01 3:03 ` [PATCH net-next v5 1/6] cls_api: modify the tc_indr_block_ing_cmd parameters wenxu
2019-08-01 3:03 ` [PATCH net-next v5 2/6] cls_api: replace block with flow_block in tc_indr_block_dev wenxu
2019-08-01 3:03 ` [PATCH net-next 3/6] cls_api: add flow_indr_block_call function wenxu
2019-08-05 6:02 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-08-05 6:26 ` wenxu
2019-08-01 3:03 ` [PATCH net-next v5 4/6] flow_offload: move tc indirect block to flow offload wenxu
2019-08-01 3:03 ` [PATCH net-next v5 5/6] flow_offload: support get flow_block immediately wenxu
2019-08-01 23:11 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-08-02 2:47 ` wenxu
2019-08-02 2:56 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-08-02 10:45 ` wenxu
2019-08-02 13:09 ` wenxu [this message]
2019-08-02 18:02 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-08-02 23:19 ` wenxu
2019-08-03 0:21 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-08-03 13:42 ` wenxu
2019-08-01 3:03 ` [PATCH net-next v5 6/6] netfilter: nf_tables_offload: support indr block call wenxu
2019-08-01 3:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-01 4:47 ` wenxu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55850b13-991f-97bd-b452-efacd0f39aa4@ucloud.cn \
--to=wenxu@ucloud.cn \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=john.hurley@netronome.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).