* Missing SetID
[not found] <372F88D9-353F-428C-9B59-A8D4D7BF5438@cisco.com>
@ 2019-08-12 18:14 ` Serguei Bezverkhi (sbezverk)
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Serguei Bezverkhi (sbezverk) @ 2019-08-12 18:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso, netfilter-devel
Hello,
I am observing a strange condition at least imho, when a set gets programmed or lookup expression with setid is programmed, when I do GETSETS or GETRULES, the set ID is always 0, but Set name is correctly preserved. If SetID is not preserved then how would be possible to differentiate between multiple anonymous sets defined for the same table?
I would appreciate some clarification. I am positive that ID gets sent to kernel in both cases, but return messages is missing SET_ID attribute.
Thank you
Serguei
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2019-08-12 18:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <372F88D9-353F-428C-9B59-A8D4D7BF5438@cisco.com>
2019-08-12 18:14 ` Missing SetID Serguei Bezverkhi (sbezverk)
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).