From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: network dev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] netfilter: set skb transport_header before calling sctp_compute_cksum
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2019 17:07:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CADvbK_djd5ckv3nTROsmHNdr0Z5ULt7MF3MXtNYAO58mo+po7Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190308155049.by7f4uzjxqnf3xu7@salvia>
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 11:50 PM Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Mar 03, 2019 at 04:17:21PM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
> > sctp_hdr(skb) only works when skb->transport_header is set
> > properly.
> >
> > But in the path of nf_conntrack_in:
> >
> > sctp_packet() -> sctp_error() -> sctp_compute_cksum().
> >
> > skb->transport_header is not guaranteed to be right value
> > for sctp. It will cause to fail to check the checksum for
> > sctp packets.
> >
> > So fix it by setting skb transport_header before calling
> > sctp_compute_cksum().
>
> I see a few more calls to sctp_compute_cksum() in the netfilter tree.
> I guess they are broken too.
>
> In netfilter, skb->transport_header is never set from the input path,
> I think this introduces an assymmetry with other transport protocols.
>
> May we have a variant of sctp_compute_cksum() which does not rely on
> sctp_hdr() instead?
I posted one before this:
https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=155109395226858&w=2
But from sctp side, Neil preferred sctp_hdr().
We need to either add skb_set_transport_header() in sctp_s/dnat_handler()
and sctp_manip_pkt(), or bring that patch back?
Now it seems not good to set skb->transport_header in netfilter code.
Hi Neil, what's your point now?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-09 9:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-03 8:17 [PATCH net] netfilter: set skb transport_header before calling sctp_compute_cksum Xin Long
2019-03-08 15:50 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-03-09 9:07 ` Xin Long [this message]
2019-03-09 9:24 ` Florian Westphal
2019-03-11 11:07 ` Neil Horman
2019-03-12 8:39 ` Xin Long
2019-03-12 9:48 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-03-12 11:01 ` Xin Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CADvbK_djd5ckv3nTROsmHNdr0Z5ULt7MF3MXtNYAO58mo+po7Q@mail.gmail.com \
--to=lucien.xin@gmail.com \
--cc=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).