netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
To: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
Cc: bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
	"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
	"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	pablo@netfilter.org, fw@strlen.de,
	netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, lorenzo.bianconi@redhat.com,
	"Jesper Dangaard Brouer" <brouer@redhat.com>,
	"Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>,
	"Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi" <memxor@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 2/4] selftests/bpf: Extend KF_TRUSTED_ARGS test for __ref annotation
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2022 14:30:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPhsuW49ZU+ak=uned=AfBbGNVboLguKVXjfsOy7hZLbUSkyag@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1bea1050068d7ad50baa2f6b6c09c9eb1ae5b4dd.1662383493.git.lorenzo@kernel.org>

On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 6:15 AM Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
>
> Extend the existing test for KF_TRUSTED_ARGS by also checking whether
> the same happens when a __ref suffix is present in argument name of a
> kfunc.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>

Acked-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>

> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c | 38 +++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c
> index 3fb4f69b1962..891fcda50d9d 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c
> @@ -219,7 +219,7 @@
>         .errstr = "variable ptr_ access var_off=(0x0; 0x7) disallowed",
>  },
>  {
> -       "calls: invalid kfunc call: referenced arg needs refcounted PTR_TO_BTF_ID",
> +       "calls: invalid kfunc call: referenced arg needs refcounted PTR_TO_BTF_ID (KF_TRUSTED_ARGS)",
>         .insns = {
>         BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10),
>         BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, -8),
> @@ -227,10 +227,30 @@
>         BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, BPF_PSEUDO_KFUNC_CALL, 0, 0),
>         BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
>         BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
> -       BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_0),
> -       BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
> +       BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 16),
>         BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, BPF_PSEUDO_KFUNC_CALL, 0, 0),
> -       BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6, 16),
> +       BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
> +       BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
> +       },
> +       .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
> +       .fixup_kfunc_btf_id = {
> +               { "bpf_kfunc_call_test_acquire", 3 },
> +               { "bpf_kfunc_call_test_trusted", 7 },
> +       },
> +       .result_unpriv = REJECT,
> +       .result = REJECT,
> +       .errstr = "R1 must be referenced",
> +},
> +{
> +       "calls: invalid kfunc call: referenced arg needs refcounted PTR_TO_BTF_ID (__ref)",
> +       .insns = {
> +       BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10),
> +       BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, -8),
> +       BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, 0, 0),
> +       BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, BPF_PSEUDO_KFUNC_CALL, 0, 0),
> +       BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
> +       BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
> +       BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 16),
>         BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, BPF_PSEUDO_KFUNC_CALL, 0, 0),
>         BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
>         BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
> @@ -238,8 +258,7 @@
>         .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
>         .fixup_kfunc_btf_id = {
>                 { "bpf_kfunc_call_test_acquire", 3 },
> -               { "bpf_kfunc_call_test_ref", 8 },
> -               { "bpf_kfunc_call_test_ref", 10 },
> +               { "bpf_kfunc_call_test_ref", 7 },
>         },
>         .result_unpriv = REJECT,
>         .result = REJECT,
> @@ -259,14 +278,17 @@
>         BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, BPF_PSEUDO_KFUNC_CALL, 0, 0),
>         BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6),
>         BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, BPF_PSEUDO_KFUNC_CALL, 0, 0),
> +       BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6),
> +       BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, BPF_PSEUDO_KFUNC_CALL, 0, 0),
>         BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
>         BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
>         },
>         .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
>         .fixup_kfunc_btf_id = {
>                 { "bpf_kfunc_call_test_acquire", 3 },
> -               { "bpf_kfunc_call_test_ref", 8 },
> -               { "bpf_kfunc_call_test_release", 10 },
> +               { "bpf_kfunc_call_test_trusted", 8 },
> +               { "bpf_kfunc_call_test_ref", 10 },
> +               { "bpf_kfunc_call_test_release", 12 },
>         },
>         .result_unpriv = REJECT,
>         .result = ACCEPT,
> --
> 2.37.3
>

  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-06 21:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-05 13:14 [PATCH v2 bpf-next 0/4] Introduce bpf_ct_set_nat_info kfunc helper Lorenzo Bianconi
2022-09-05 13:14 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 1/4] bpf: Add support for per-parameter trusted args Lorenzo Bianconi
2022-09-06 21:27   ` Song Liu
2022-09-05 13:14 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 2/4] selftests/bpf: Extend KF_TRUSTED_ARGS test for __ref annotation Lorenzo Bianconi
2022-09-06 21:30   ` Song Liu [this message]
2022-09-05 13:14 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 3/4] net: netfilter: add bpf_ct_set_nat_info kfunc helper Lorenzo Bianconi
2022-09-06 21:36   ` Song Liu
2022-09-07  9:01     ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2022-09-07  4:27   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-09-07  4:39     ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-09-07  5:15       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-09-07  5:51         ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-09-07 17:33           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-09-07 18:12             ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-09-05 13:14 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 4/4] selftests/bpf: add tests for bpf_ct_set_nat_info kfunc Lorenzo Bianconi
2022-09-06 21:54   ` Song Liu
2022-09-07 10:47     ` Lorenzo Bianconi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAPhsuW49ZU+ak=uned=AfBbGNVboLguKVXjfsOy7hZLbUSkyag@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.bianconi@redhat.com \
    --cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=toke@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).