From: Kevin 'ldir' Darbyshire-Bryant <ldir@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk>
To: Jeremy Sowden <jeremy@azazel.net>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
"netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org"
<netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] netfilter: connmark: introduce set-dscpmark
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2019 09:46:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DA14999D-D2D2-42C5-91BC-E3A8A7D0AA46@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191205085657.GF133447@azazel.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1659 bytes --]
> On 5 Dec 2019, at 08:56, Jeremy Sowden <jeremy@azazel.net> wrote:
>
> On 2019-12-03, at 16:06:52 +0000, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant wrote:
>> Greetings. The following patch is similar to one I submitted as an
>> RFC quite a while back (April). Since then I've realised that the
>> option should have been in the 'set mark' family as opposed to 'save
>> mark' because 'set' is about setting the ct mark directly, whereas
>> 'save' is about copying a packet's mark to the ct mark.
>>
>> Similarly I've been made aware of the revision infrastructure and now
>> that I understand that a little more have made use of it for this
>> change. Hopefully this addresses one of Pablo's concerns.
>>
>> I've not been able to address the 'I'd like an nftables version'.
>> Quite simply it is beyond my knowledge and ability. I am willing to
>> contribute financially if someone wishes to step up to the nftables
>> plate...yes I'd like to see the functionality implemented *that* much.
>
> I'll do it (no financial contribution required :)). There is one thing I
> want to find out before I get started.
Hi Jeremy,
You’ll permit me to make a donation in appreciation of your efforts though?
I’m not totally convinced that what I’ve submitted for x_tables is the
‘perfect’ way of implementing the function so it’s a plea for guidance as
much as anything :-)
> Pablo, comparing the x_tables and nftables connmark implementations I
> see that nftables doesn't support all the bit-twiddling that x_tables
> does. Why is this? Was it not wanted or has it just not been imple-
> mented?
>
> J.
Thanks,
Kevin
[-- Attachment #2: Message signed with OpenPGP --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-05 9:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-24 14:23 [RFC PATCH 0/1] netfilter: xt_connmark: add savedscp-mark action Kevin 'ldir' Darbyshire-Bryant
2019-03-24 14:23 ` [PATCH 1/1] netfilter: connmark: introduce savedscp Kevin 'ldir' Darbyshire-Bryant
2019-04-08 22:39 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-04-08 23:16 ` Kevin 'ldir' Darbyshire-Bryant
2019-04-09 14:23 ` [RFC nf-next v2 0/2] xt_connmark: add savedscp-mark action Kevin 'ldir' Darbyshire-Bryant
2019-04-09 14:23 ` [RFC nf-next v2 1/2] netfilter: connmark: introduce savedscp Kevin 'ldir' Darbyshire-Bryant
2019-04-30 12:29 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-04-30 20:40 ` Kevin 'ldir' Darbyshire-Bryant
2019-04-09 14:23 ` [RFC nf-next 2/2] iptables: connmark - add savedscp option Kevin 'ldir' Darbyshire-Bryant
2019-12-03 16:06 ` [PATCH 0/1] netfilter: connmark: introduce set-dscpmark Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2019-12-03 16:06 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2019-12-09 23:57 ` Kevin 'ldir' Darbyshire-Bryant
2019-12-05 8:56 ` [PATCH 0/1] " Jeremy Sowden
2019-12-05 9:46 ` Kevin 'ldir' Darbyshire-Bryant [this message]
2019-12-06 8:54 ` Jeremy Sowden
2019-12-05 10:49 ` Florian Westphal
2019-12-05 22:00 ` Jeremy Sowden
2019-12-09 21:42 ` [RFC PATCH nf-next] netfilter: conntrack: add support for storing DiffServ code-point as CT mark Jeremy Sowden
2019-12-09 21:42 ` [RFC PATCH nftables] Add "ct dscpmark" conntrack statement Jeremy Sowden
2019-12-09 22:47 ` [RFC PATCH nf-next] netfilter: conntrack: add support for storing DiffServ code-point as CT mark Florian Westphal
2019-12-09 23:23 ` Jeremy Sowden
2019-12-10 1:25 ` Florian Westphal
2019-12-10 11:01 ` Jeremy Sowden
2019-12-10 11:32 ` Florian Westphal
2019-12-10 19:52 ` Jeremy Sowden
2019-12-11 13:01 ` [PATCH nf-next v2] netfilter: connmark: introduce set-dscpmark Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DA14999D-D2D2-42C5-91BC-E3A8A7D0AA46@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk \
--to=ldir@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk \
--cc=jeremy@azazel.net \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).