From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13AF7C64EC4 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 12:38:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229634AbjCJMh5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Mar 2023 07:37:57 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49260 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230456AbjCJMhl (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Mar 2023 07:37:41 -0500 Received: from orbyte.nwl.cc (orbyte.nwl.cc [IPv6:2001:41d0:e:133a::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02535115642 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 04:37:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from n0-1 by orbyte.nwl.cc with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1pabzp-00022C-Cs; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 13:37:17 +0100 Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 13:37:17 +0100 From: Phil Sutter To: Pablo Neira Ayuso Cc: Jozsef Kadlecsik , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [ipset PATCH 0/2] Two minor code fixes Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Phil Sutter , Pablo Neira Ayuso , Jozsef Kadlecsik , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org References: <20230222170241.26208-1-phil@nwl.cc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 01:22:16PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 01:05:23PM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 12:56:29PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 10:04:14AM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote: > > > > On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 11:28:36PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 06:02:39PM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote: > > > > > > These were identified by Coverity tool, no problems in practice. Still > > > > > > worth fixing to reduce noise in code checkers. > > > > > > > > > > LGTM. > > > > > > > > > > Did you run ipset xlate tests? These should not break those but just > > > > > in case. > > > > > > > > I didn't, thanks for the reminder. Testsuite fails, but it does with > > > > HEAD as well. And so does the other testsuite ("make tests"), BtW. I'll > > > > investigate. > > > > > > Does this work after your testsuite updates? If so, push them out. > > > > Yes, it does. Should I push the testsuite updates, too? I'm uncertain > > about the s/vrrp/carp/, don't want to break anyone's test setup. > > I can see some distros still use vrrp en /etc/protocols, yes, I'm > ambivalent on this one. Maybe better just use a different protocol which didn't get "renamed" recently? It's for testing purposes only and the actual value doesn't matter much, right?