netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Todd Seidelmann <tseidelmann@linode.com>
To: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, fw@strlen.de
Subject: [PATCH nf] netfilter: ebtables: Fix argument order to ADD_COUNTER
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 10:54:16 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f4bc27ff-50b5-9522-379e-68208c029f2e@linode.com> (raw)

The ordering of arguments to the x_tables ADD_COUNTER macro
appears to be wrong in ebtables (cf. ip_tables.c, ip6_tables.c,
and arp_tables.c).

This causes data corruption in the ebtables userspace tools
because they get incorrect packet & byte counts from the kernel.

Fixes: d72133e628803 ("netfilter: ebtables: use ADD_COUNTER macro")
Signed-off-by: Todd Seidelmann<tseidelmann@linode.com>
---
My last submission that included Florian Westphal's requests
seems to have been lost in the ether, so I'm resending.
Apologies for the spam.

  net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c | 8 ++++----
  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c b/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c
index c8177a8..4096d8a 100644
--- a/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c
+++ b/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c
@@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ unsigned int ebt_do_table(struct sk_buff *skb,
              return NF_DROP;
          }

-        ADD_COUNTER(*(counter_base + i), 1, skb->len);
+        ADD_COUNTER(*(counter_base + i), skb->len, 1);

          /* these should only watch: not modify, nor tell us
           * what to do with the packet
@@ -959,8 +959,8 @@ static void get_counters(const struct ebt_counter *oldcounters,
              continue;
          counter_base = COUNTER_BASE(oldcounters, nentries, cpu);
          for (i = 0; i < nentries; i++)
-            ADD_COUNTER(counters[i], counter_base[i].pcnt,
-                    counter_base[i].bcnt);
+            ADD_COUNTER(counters[i], counter_base[i].bcnt,
+                    counter_base[i].pcnt);
      }
  }

@@ -1280,7 +1280,7 @@ static int do_update_counters(struct net *net, const char *name,

      /* we add to the counters of the first cpu */
      for (i = 0; i < num_counters; i++)
-        ADD_COUNTER(t->private->counters[i], tmp[i].pcnt, tmp[i].bcnt);
+        ADD_COUNTER(t->private->counters[i], tmp[i].bcnt, tmp[i].pcnt);

      write_unlock_bh(&t->lock);
      ret = 0;
--
1.8.3.1


             reply	other threads:[~2019-08-14 14:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-14 14:54 Todd Seidelmann [this message]
2019-08-14 14:54 ` [PATCH nf] netfilter: ebtables: Fix argument order to ADD_COUNTER Florian Westphal
2019-08-19 10:49 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-08-13 13:22 Todd Seidelmann
2019-08-13 13:29 ` Florian Westphal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f4bc27ff-50b5-9522-379e-68208c029f2e@linode.com \
    --to=tseidelmann@linode.com \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).