From: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com> To: <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: rcampbell@nvidia.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>, hughd@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, willy@infradead.org, hch@infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, peterx@redhat.com, shakeelb@google.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, jgg@nvidia.com, bskeggs@redhat.com Subject: [Nouveau] [PATCH v11 06/10] mm/memory.c: Allow different return codes for copy_nonpresent_pte() Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 20:59:33 +1000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210616105937.23201-7-apopple@nvidia.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210616105937.23201-1-apopple@nvidia.com> Currently if copy_nonpresent_pte() returns a non-zero value it is assumed to be a swap entry which requires further processing outside the loop in copy_pte_range() after dropping locks. This prevents other values being returned to signal conditions such as failure which a subsequent change requires. Instead make copy_nonpresent_pte() return an error code if further processing is required and read the value for the swap entry in the main loop under the ptl. Signed-off-by: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> --- v11: Rebase on mmots v10: Use a unique error code and only check return codes for handling. v9: New for v9 to allow device exclusive handling to occur in copy_nonpresent_pte(). --- mm/memory.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c index b4588402b777..1ac4d0b07c99 100644 --- a/mm/memory.c +++ b/mm/memory.c @@ -717,7 +717,7 @@ copy_nonpresent_pte(struct mm_struct *dst_mm, struct mm_struct *src_mm, if (likely(!non_swap_entry(entry))) { if (swap_duplicate(entry) < 0) - return entry.val; + return -EIO; /* make sure dst_mm is on swapoff's mmlist. */ if (unlikely(list_empty(&dst_mm->mmlist))) { @@ -973,12 +973,14 @@ copy_pte_range(struct vm_area_struct *dst_vma, struct vm_area_struct *src_vma, continue; } if (unlikely(!pte_present(*src_pte))) { - entry.val = copy_nonpresent_pte(dst_mm, src_mm, - dst_pte, src_pte, - dst_vma, src_vma, - addr, rss); - if (entry.val) + ret = copy_nonpresent_pte(dst_mm, src_mm, + dst_pte, src_pte, + dst_vma, src_vma, + addr, rss); + if (ret == -EIO) { + entry = pte_to_swp_entry(*src_pte); break; + } progress += 8; continue; } @@ -1011,20 +1013,24 @@ copy_pte_range(struct vm_area_struct *dst_vma, struct vm_area_struct *src_vma, pte_unmap_unlock(orig_dst_pte, dst_ptl); cond_resched(); - if (entry.val) { + if (ret == -EIO) { + VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!entry.val); if (add_swap_count_continuation(entry, GFP_KERNEL) < 0) { ret = -ENOMEM; goto out; } entry.val = 0; - } else if (ret) { - WARN_ON_ONCE(ret != -EAGAIN); + } else if (ret == -EAGAIN) { prealloc = page_copy_prealloc(src_mm, src_vma, addr); if (!prealloc) return -ENOMEM; - /* We've captured and resolved the error. Reset, try again. */ - ret = 0; + } else if (ret) { + VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(1); } + + /* We've captured and resolved the error. Reset, try again. */ + ret = 0; + if (addr != end) goto again; out: -- 2.20.1 _______________________________________________ Nouveau mailing list Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-16 11:01 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-06-16 10:59 [Nouveau] [PATCH v11 00/10] Add support for SVM atomics in Nouveau Alistair Popple 2021-06-16 10:59 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v11 01/10] mm: Remove special swap entry functions Alistair Popple 2021-06-16 10:59 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v11 02/10] mm/swapops: Rework swap entry manipulation code Alistair Popple 2021-06-16 10:59 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v11 03/10] mm/rmap: Split try_to_munlock from try_to_unmap Alistair Popple 2021-06-16 10:59 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v11 04/10] mm/rmap: Split migration into its own function Alistair Popple 2021-06-16 10:59 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v11 05/10] mm: Rename migrate_pgmap_owner Alistair Popple 2021-06-16 10:59 ` Alistair Popple [this message] 2021-06-16 10:59 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v11 07/10] mm: Device exclusive memory access Alistair Popple 2021-06-16 10:59 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v11 08/10] mm: Selftests for exclusive device memory Alistair Popple 2021-06-16 10:59 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v11 09/10] nouveau/svm: Refactor nouveau_range_fault Alistair Popple 2021-06-16 10:59 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v11 10/10] nouveau/svm: Implement atomic SVM access Alistair Popple 2021-06-16 23:35 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v11 00/10] Add support for SVM atomics in Nouveau Andrew Morton 2021-06-17 1:32 ` Alistair Popple 2021-06-17 1:29 ` [Nouveau] Update: " Alistair Popple
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20210616105937.23201-7-apopple@nvidia.com \ --to=apopple@nvidia.com \ --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \ --cc=bskeggs@redhat.com \ --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \ --cc=hch@infradead.org \ --cc=hughd@google.com \ --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \ --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \ --cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \ --cc=peterx@redhat.com \ --cc=rcampbell@nvidia.com \ --cc=shakeelb@google.com \ --cc=willy@infradead.org \ --subject='Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH v11 06/10] mm/memory.c: Allow different return codes for copy_nonpresent_pte()' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).