From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71E71C433E0 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 00:21:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10D686023B for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 00:21:43 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 10D686023B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=nvidia.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=nouveau-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B0DC6E0CE; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 00:21:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hqnvemgate26.nvidia.com (hqnvemgate26.nvidia.com [216.228.121.65]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BCE06E0CC; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 00:21:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hqmail.nvidia.com (Not Verified[216.228.121.13]) by hqnvemgate26.nvidia.com (using TLS: TLSv1.2, AES256-SHA) id ; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 16:21:41 -0800 Received: from nvdebian.localnet (172.20.145.6) by HQMAIL107.nvidia.com (172.20.187.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 00:21:37 +0000 From: Alistair Popple To: Jason Gunthorpe Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 11:21:35 +1100 Message-ID: <3156280.dJpzq75PnV@nvdebian> In-Reply-To: <20210301174642.GP4247@nvidia.com> References: <20210226071832.31547-1-apopple@nvidia.com> <20210226071832.31547-2-apopple@nvidia.com> <20210301174642.GP4247@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [172.20.145.6] X-ClientProxiedBy: HQMAIL111.nvidia.com (172.20.187.18) To HQMAIL107.nvidia.com (172.20.187.13) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nvidia.com; s=n1; t=1614644501; bh=azDUrxm78xZYK+HMnHGyx9Cls7mv6No8+tEzyjhqkY4=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: X-Originating-IP:X-ClientProxiedBy; b=OWpxffKeP4tRIYOnIzWmKU2ko4OneFNOwVj+FyTqa4wUuAyUq/G035xSN96rL3s4U CA2Le5hOQkxj09JDqjwtL+dcVozOjVJOqsAP/77YPxoAGDgKoCS+uC44nuPIHShHJu AQcoFQv2I5HrVxcpLUdaEYX96qs+Fbn+H4WH6IiNhxMuJse6m0q6LImPEePfGXcqS3 y8rWRlSZ6kxZv7XVJ05BMWPXBFERIbAwCPh/cbO3qmpQiPSlkeCWEOdT2cGGNX3CKM xj85TG9o7jkYYmeYx1sJ/KOkEFDUPRj2HB/Euue8YPgbHDP8xnwpiiRC88gPjPdE07 Dv/DTQIp44Jsg== Subject: Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH v3 1/8] mm: Remove special swap entry functions X-BeenThere: nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Nouveau development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: rcampbell@nvidia.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, hch@infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, bskeggs@redhat.com, daniel@ffwll.ch, akpm@linux-foundation.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: nouveau-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Nouveau" On Tuesday, 2 March 2021 4:46:42 AM AEDT Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > I wish you could come up with a more descriptive word that special > here > > What I understand is this is true when the swap_offset is a pfn? Correct, and that points to a better name. Maybe is_pfn_swap_entry()? In which case adding a helper as Christoph suggested makes some more sense. Eg: pfn_swap_entry_to_page() > > -static inline struct page *migration_entry_to_page(swp_entry_t entry) > > -{ > > - struct page *p = pfn_to_page(swp_offset(entry)); > > - /* > > - * Any use of migration entries may only occur while the > > - * corresponding page is locked > > - */ > > - BUG_ON(!PageLocked(compound_head(p))); > > - return p; > > And this constraint has been completely lost? Yes, sorry I should have called that out. I didn't think loosing the check was a big deal, but I can add some checks to some of the call sites which would catch a page being incorrectly unlocked. > A comment in front of the is_special_entry explaining all the rule > would help alot Will add one. > Transformation looks fine otherwise Thanks. - Alistair > Jason > _______________________________________________ Nouveau mailing list Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau