ntb.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frank Li <frank.li@nxp.com>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Cc: "Shunsuke Mie" <mie@igel.co.jp>, "Jon Mason" <jdmason@kudzu.us>,
	"Dave Jiang" <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
	"Allen Hubbe" <allenbh@gmail.com>,
	"kishon@kernel.org" <kishon@kernel.org>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"ntb@lists.linux.dev" <ntb@lists.linux.dev>,
	"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-{,v}ntb: fix a check for no epc alignment constraint
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 16:25:01 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <HE1PR0401MB2331032AECAE30A8C31AF01A88339@HE1PR0401MB2331.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221027160932.GD76627@thinkpad>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2022 11:10 AM
> To: Frank Li <frank.li@nxp.com>
> Cc: Shunsuke Mie <mie@igel.co.jp>; Jon Mason <jdmason@kudzu.us>; Dave
> Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>; Allen Hubbe <allenbh@gmail.com>;
> kishon@kernel.org; Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>; Krzysztof
> Wilczyński <kw@linux.com>; Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>;
> ntb@lists.linux.dev; linux-pci@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-{,v}ntb: fix a check for
> no epc alignment constraint
> 
> Caution: EXT Email
> 
> [Added Kishon's new email address and removed the old one]
> 
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 03:34:11PM +0000, Frank Li wrote:
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> > > Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2022 10:12 AM
> > > To: Frank Li <frank.li@nxp.com>
> > > Cc: Shunsuke Mie <mie@igel.co.jp>; Jon Mason <jdmason@kudzu.us>;
> Dave
> > > Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>; Allen Hubbe <allenbh@gmail.com>;
> Kishon
> > > Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>; Lorenzo Pieralisi
> <lpieralisi@kernel.org>;
> > > Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@linux.com>; Bjorn Helgaas
> > > <bhelgaas@google.com>; ntb@lists.linux.dev; linux-pci@vger.kernel.org;
> > > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > > Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-{,v}ntb: fix a check
> for
> > > no epc alignment constraint
> > >
> > > Caution: EXT Email
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 02:35:56PM +0000, Frank Li wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Shunsuke Mie <mie@igel.co.jp>
> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2022 8:43 PM
> > > > > To: Frank Li <frank.li@nxp.com>
> > > > > Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>;
> Jon
> > > > > Mason <jdmason@kudzu.us>; Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>;
> Allen
> > > > > Hubbe <allenbh@gmail.com>; Kishon Vijay Abraham I
> <kishon@ti.com>;
> > > > > Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>; Krzysztof Wilczyński
> > > > > <kw@linux.com>; Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>;
> > > > > ntb@lists.linux.dev; linux-pci@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> > > kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > > > > Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-{,v}ntb: fix a
> check
> > > for
> > > > > no epc alignment constraint
> > > > >
> > > > > Caution: EXT Email
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Frank,
> > > > >
> > > > > 2022年10月26日(水) 1:07 Frank Li <frank.li@nxp.com>:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > From: Manivannan Sadhasivam
> <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2022 9:22 AM
> > > > > > > To: Shunsuke Mie <mie@igel.co.jp>
> > > > > > > Cc: Jon Mason <jdmason@kudzu.us>; Dave Jiang
> > > <dave.jiang@intel.com>;
> > > > > > > Allen Hubbe <allenbh@gmail.com>; Kishon Vijay Abraham I
> > > > > > > <kishon@ti.com>; Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>;
> Krzysztof
> > > > > > > Wilczyński <kw@linux.com>; Bjorn Helgaas
> <bhelgaas@google.com>;
> > > > > > > ntb@lists.linux.dev; linux-pci@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> > > > > kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > > > > > > Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-{,v}ntb: fix a
> check
> > > for
> > > > > no
> > > > > > > epc alignment constraint
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Caution: EXT Email
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 06:23:57PM +0900, Shunsuke Mie wrote:
> > > > > > > > Some PCI endpoint controllers have no alignment constraints,
> and
> > > the
> > > > > > > > epc_features->align becomes 0. In this case, IS_ALIGNED() in
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [Frank Li] why not set epc_features->align 1
> > > > > > no alignment constraints should mean align to byte.
> > > > > It is one of the solutions too I think. But in that case,  we need to
> > > > > write epc_features->align = 1 to all epc drivers, dwc, qcom, rcar,
> > > > > tegra, and etc.
> > > > >
> > > > > I think that my change is better.
> > > >
> > > > I think it should be based on what original term defined.
> > > > It should be fixed at where make mistake.
> > > >
> > >
> > > 1byte is the default alignment that drivers can assume, why do you want
> > > drivers
> > > to set them explicitly when they do not want any special alignment?
> >
> > What's definition of not alignment by align variable?
> > Using both 0 and 1 as no alignment is not good enough.
> >
> > I grep whole kernel driver directory, not one use
> >       If (align && IS_ALIGNED(x, align))  statement.
> 
> I can see multiple hits:
> 
> lib/ubsan.c
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c
> drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c
> drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c
> 
> But in most of the places, the alignment is guaranteed to be set by the client
> drivers because they might be read from the hardware register or fixed for
> an
> IP. But in this case, I don't think we should _force_ the drivers to set
> alignment to 1 (default) if they don't really care about it.

I keep my opinion.  I think EP controller have not reported correct data.
Hardware register also can be set 0 as no alignment means. 
It broken "align" conversion.  

If most people prefer this way, I suggest change api document at 
Include/linux/pci-epc.h to explicitly said 0 is validate option.  

> 
> Thanks,
> Mani
> 
> >
> > There are a common convention, align is 2^n
> >
> >
> > >
> > > I think this patch is fine.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Mani
> > >
> > > > Are there other place use align == 0 means no alignment in kernel?
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > epf_ntb_config_spad_bar_alloc() doesn't work well. Check for
> this
> > > > > before
> > > > > > > > IS_ALIGNED().
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Shunsuke Mie <mie@igel.co.jp>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam
> > > > > > > <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Mani
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > Changes in v2:
> > > > > > > > * Fix the commit message in phrasings and words.
> > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > >  drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-ntb.c  | 2 +-
> > > > > > > >  drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-vntb.c | 2 +-
> > > > > > > >  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-ntb.c
> > > > > > > b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-ntb.c
> > > > > > > > index 9a00448c7e61..f74155ee8d72 100644
> > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-ntb.c
> > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-ntb.c
> > > > > > > > @@ -1021,7 +1021,7 @@ static int
> > > > > epf_ntb_config_spad_bar_alloc(struct
> > > > > > > epf_ntb *ntb,
> > > > > > > >       peer_size = peer_epc_features->bar_fixed_size[peer_barno];
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >       /* Check if epc_features is populated incorrectly */
> > > > > > > > -     if ((!IS_ALIGNED(size, align)))
> > > > > > > > +     if (align && (!IS_ALIGNED(size, align)))
> > > > > > > >               return -EINVAL;
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >       spad_count = ntb->spad_count;
> > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-vntb.c
> > > > > > > b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-vntb.c
> > > > > > > > index 0ea85e1d292e..5e346c0a0f05 100644
> > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-vntb.c
> > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-vntb.c
> > > > > > > > @@ -418,7 +418,7 @@ static int
> > > epf_ntb_config_spad_bar_alloc(struct
> > > > > > > epf_ntb *ntb)
> > > > > > > >       size = epc_features->bar_fixed_size[barno];
> > > > > > > >       align = epc_features->align;
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -     if ((!IS_ALIGNED(size, align)))
> > > > > > > > +     if (align && !IS_ALIGNED(size, align))
> > > > > > > >               return -EINVAL;
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >       spad_count = ntb->spad_count;
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > 2.17.1
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > > Shunsuke
> > >
> > > --
> > > மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
> 
> --
> மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்

  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-27 16:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-22  9:23 [PATCH v2] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-{,v}ntb: fix a check for no epc alignment constraint Shunsuke Mie
2022-10-25 14:21 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-10-25 16:07   ` [EXT] " Frank Li
2022-10-27  1:43     ` Shunsuke Mie
2022-10-27 14:35       ` Frank Li
2022-10-27 15:12         ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-10-27 15:34           ` Frank Li
2022-10-27 16:09             ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-10-27 16:25               ` Frank Li [this message]
2022-10-28 10:56                 ` Shunsuke Mie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=HE1PR0401MB2331032AECAE30A8C31AF01A88339@HE1PR0401MB2331.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=frank.li@nxp.com \
    --cc=allenbh@gmail.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=jdmason@kudzu.us \
    --cc=kishon@kernel.org \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=mie@igel.co.jp \
    --cc=ntb@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).