From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0015.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D86115B0 for ; Fri, 23 Sep 2022 02:06:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omf10.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DAAF40B3E; Fri, 23 Sep 2022 00:47:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [HIDDEN] (Authenticated sender: joe@perches.com) by omf10.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id BD6E32F; Fri, 23 Sep 2022 00:47:41 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <34b60d0ed48e4384e82a29020702ee2471092fb1.camel@perches.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/ntfs3: fix negative shift size in true_sectors_per_clst() From: Joe Perches To: Randy Dunlap , Tetsuo Handa , Konstantin Komarov , Andrew Morton , Namjae Jeon , Shigeru Yoshida Cc: syzbot , syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com, ntfs3@lists.linux.dev, LKML Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 17:47:51 -0700 In-Reply-To: References: <000000000000f8b5ef05dd25b963@google.com> <4b37f037-3b10-b4e4-0644-73441c8fa0af@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.44.4 (3.44.4-1.fc36) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: ntfs3@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Rspamd-Server: rspamout03 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: BD6E32F X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.46 X-Stat-Signature: eo3ixo5odzpwpf9s5tiwmc7efjghe9qh X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Session-ID: U2FsdGVkX1/xx4yzr8Tvi0rO8ab9gqFKolV42Rk2IkU= X-HE-Tag: 1663894061-333989 On Thu, 2022-09-22 at 17:38 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > it appears that the NTFS3 maintainer is MIA again. :( (I've no affiliation with the NTFS3 maintainer or paragon) Perhaps the expectation of prioritized immediate turnaround is unrealistic. It's free. Be patient.