Re: [PATCH 1/4] s390/cio: Rename bitmap_size() as idset_bitmap_size()

[Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>]

On Sat, Jul 02, 2022 at 09:24:24PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Le 02/07/2022 à 20:54, Andy Shevchenko a écrit :
> > On Sat, Jul 02, 2022 at 08:29:09PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:

...

> > > -		memset(set->bitmap, 0, bitmap_size(num_ssid, num_id));
> > > +		memset(set->bitmap, 0, idset_bitmap_size(num_ssid, num_id));
> > 
> > Why not to use bitmap_zero()?

...

> > > -	memset(set->bitmap, 0xff, bitmap_size(set->num_ssid, set->num_id));
> > > +	memset(set->bitmap, 0xff, idset_bitmap_size(set->num_ssid, set->num_id));
> > 
> > Why not to use bitmap_fill() ?

> For this initial step, I wanted to keep changes as minimal as possible (i.e
> just function renaming)
> 
> In fact, I plan to send a follow-up patch on this file.
> This would remove the newly renamed idset_bitmap_size() function, use the
> bitmap API directly (as you pointed-out) with
> "set->num_ssid * set->num_id" as size.
> 
> It is already done this way in idset_is_empty(), so it would be more
> consistent.
> 
> If the serie needs a v2 (or if required), I can add an additional 5th patch
> for it. Otherwise it will send separatly later.

If you use bitmap APIs as I suggested above as the first patch, the rest will
have less unneeded churn, no?


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko