nvdimm.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
To: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
	linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, Aristeu Rozanski <aris@redhat.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] firmware: dmi: Add function to look up a handle and return DIMM size
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 15:03:58 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180309230357.iz7fx47qywx4ijnj@agluck-desk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180309112053.20605672@endymion>

On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 11:20:53AM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > +	else if (size & 0x8000)
> > +		bytes = (u64)(size & 0x7fff) << 10;
> > +	else if (size != 0x7fff)
> > +		bytes = (u64)size << 20;
> > +	else
> > +		bytes = (u64)get_unaligned((u32 *)&d[0x1C]) << 20;
> > +
> > +	dmi_memdev[nr].size = bytes;
> 
> I'm curious, do you really need to know the amount of memory to the
> byte? The SMBIOS specification itself does not support granularity
> under 1 kB. I would be very surprised if any machine running Linux
> today has memory modules under 1 MB. If storing in MB you wouldn't need
> a u64...

I got side-tracked reading the standard with the ancient ways
used to report size back in the day when kilobytes was a
plausible unit. So I wrote code that covers all the crazy
cases.  Persistant DIMMs have sizes measured in gigabytes.
I should stop worrying about "0" vs. "fffffff" and just treat
the old cases as errors and simplify the code to be:

	u32 mbytes;

	if (size == 0 || (size & 0x8000))
		mbytes = 0;
	if (size != 0x7fff)
		mbytes = size;
	else
		mbytes = get_unaligned((u32 *)&d[0x1C]);

Then I can use 32-bit throughout this and patch 5.

Thanks for the review.

-Tony
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm

  reply	other threads:[~2018-03-09 22:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-22 19:58 [PATCH 0/5] Teach EDAC about non-volatile DIMMs and add partial support to skx_edac Tony Luck
2018-02-22 19:58 ` [PATCH 1/5] EDAC: Drop duplicated array of strings for memory type names Tony Luck
2018-02-22 19:58 ` [PATCH 2/5] edac: Add new memory type for non-volatile DIMMs Tony Luck
2018-02-22 19:58 ` [PATCH 3/5] acpi, nfit: Add function to look up nvdimm device and provide SMBIOS handle Tony Luck
2018-02-28 17:36   ` Ross Zwisler
2018-02-28 18:48     ` Borislav Petkov
2018-02-22 19:58 ` [PATCH 4/5] firmware: dmi: Add function to look up a handle and return DIMM size Tony Luck
2018-03-09 10:20   ` Jean Delvare
2018-03-09 23:03     ` Luck, Tony [this message]
2018-03-10 13:22       ` Jean Delvare
2018-03-12 16:46         ` Luck, Tony
2018-02-22 19:58 ` [PATCH 5/5] EDAC, skx_edac: Detect non-volatile DIMMs Tony Luck
2018-03-09 10:38   ` Jean Delvare
2018-02-28 13:04 ` [PATCH 0/5] Teach EDAC about non-volatile DIMMs and add partial support to skx_edac Borislav Petkov
2018-02-28 13:59   ` Dan Williams
2018-03-12 18:24     ` [PATCH 0/5 V3] " Tony Luck
2018-03-12 18:24       ` [PATCH 1/5] EDAC: Drop duplicated array of strings for memory type names Tony Luck
2018-03-12 18:24       ` [PATCH 2/5] edac: Add new memory type for non-volatile DIMMs Tony Luck
2018-03-12 18:24       ` [PATCH 3/5] acpi, nfit: Add function to look up nvdimm device and provide SMBIOS handle Tony Luck
2018-03-12 18:24       ` [PATCH 4/5] firmware: dmi: Add function to look up a handle and return DIMM size Tony Luck
2018-03-13  9:43         ` Jean Delvare
2018-03-12 18:24       ` [PATCH 5/5] EDAC, skx_edac: Detect non-volatile DIMMs Tony Luck
2018-03-13  9:59         ` Jean Delvare
2018-03-13 15:59           ` Luck, Tony
2018-03-13 16:16             ` Jean Delvare
2018-03-14 12:00             ` Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180309230357.iz7fx47qywx4ijnj@agluck-desk \
    --to=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=aris@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=jdelvare@suse.de \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
    --cc=lv.zheng@intel.com \
    --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
    --cc=qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).