From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from newverein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 044102111FE43 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 13:08:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2018 22:11:52 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 07/13] block: Add PCI P2P flag for request queue and check support for requests Message-ID: <20180905201152.GA1893@lst.de> References: <20180830185352.3369-1-logang@deltatee.com> <20180830185352.3369-8-logang@deltatee.com> <20180901082812.GB670@lst.de> <5f79c012-c6e1-56bb-62fd-0689181fb2c9@deltatee.com> <59b28977-8f2a-6228-2050-03fae6bdbedd@kernel.dk> <1b4283da-44df-4a02-3167-e295243cef78@deltatee.com> <09258b9b-3aed-9890-b31a-bd70a133966c@kernel.dk> <20180905195647.GA1626@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-nvdimm-bounces@lists.01.org Sender: "Linux-nvdimm" To: Jens Axboe Cc: Alex Williamson , linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, =?iso-8859-1?B?Suly9G1l?= Glisse , Jason Gunthorpe , Christian =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6nig?= , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Bjorn Helgaas , Max Gurtovoy , Christoph Hellwig List-ID: On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 01:54:31PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 9/5/18 1:56 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 01:45:04PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > >> The point is that the caller doesn't necessarily know where the bio > >> will end up, hence the caller can't fully check if the whole stack > >> supports P2P. > > > > The caller must necessarily know where the bio will end up, as for P2P > > support we need to query if the bio target is P2P capable vs the > > source of the P2P memory. > > Then what's the point of having the check at all? Just an additional little safe guard. If you think it isn't worth it I guess we can just drop it for now. _______________________________________________ Linux-nvdimm mailing list Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm