From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org,
tj@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com,
rafael@kernel.org, len.brown@intel.com, zwisler@kernel.org,
dan.j.williams@intel.com, dave.jiang@intel.com,
bvanassche@acm.org
Subject: Re: [driver-core PATCH v6 2/9] async: Add support for queueing on specific NUMA node
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 23:10:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181113221014.GB2235@amd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181111203304.GA16871@kroah.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1986 bytes --]
Hi!
> > > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > >
> > > No one else from Intel has reviewed/verified this code at all?
> > >
> > > Please take advantages of the resources you have that most people do
> > > not, get reviewes from your coworkers please before you send this out
> > > again, as they can give you valuable help before the community has to
> > > review the code...
> >
> > We always said to companies we want to see code as soon as
> > possible. You don't have to review their code, but discouraging the
> > posting seems wrong.
>
> I have a long history of Intel using me for their basic "find the
> obvious bugs" review process for new driver subsystems and core changes.
> When I see new major patches show up from an Intel developer without
> _any_ other review from anyone else, directed at me, I get suspicious it
> is happening again.
>
> If you note, Intel is the _only_ company I say this to their developers
> because of this problem combined with the fact that they have a whole
> load of developers that they should be running things by first.
>
> And yes, to answer Dan's point, we do want to do review in public. But
> this is v6 of a core patchset and there has been NO review from anyone
> else at Intel on this. So if that review was going to happen, one would
> have thought it would have by now, instead of relying on me to do it.
>
> And yes, I am grumpy, but I am grumpy because of the history here. I am
> not trying to discourage anything, only to take ADVANTAGE of resources
> that almost no other company provides.
>
> Hope this helps explain my statement here.
Thanks for explanation. I did not have same bad experience with Intel,
so I did not understand what was going on.
Best regards,
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-13 22:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-08 18:06 [driver-core PATCH v6 0/9] Add NUMA aware async_schedule calls Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 18:06 ` [driver-core PATCH v6 1/9] workqueue: Provide queue_work_node to queue work near a given NUMA node Alexander Duyck
2018-11-27 1:01 ` Dan Williams
2018-11-08 18:06 ` [driver-core PATCH v6 2/9] async: Add support for queueing on specific " Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 23:36 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-11 19:32 ` Greg KH
2018-11-11 19:53 ` Dan Williams
2018-11-11 20:35 ` Greg KH
2018-11-11 22:17 ` Dan Williams
2018-11-11 23:27 ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-11 19:59 ` Pavel Machek
2018-11-11 20:33 ` Greg KH
2018-11-11 21:24 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-13 22:10 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2018-11-27 1:10 ` Dan Williams
2018-11-08 18:06 ` [driver-core PATCH v6 3/9] device core: Consolidate locking and unlocking of parent and device Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 22:43 ` jane.chu
2018-11-08 22:48 ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-27 1:44 ` Dan Williams
2018-11-08 18:07 ` [driver-core PATCH v6 4/9] driver core: Move async_synchronize_full call Alexander Duyck
2018-11-27 2:11 ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 17:38 ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-27 20:35 ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 21:36 ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-27 22:26 ` Dan Williams
2018-11-08 18:07 ` [driver-core PATCH v6 5/9] driver core: Establish clear order of operations for deferred probe and remove Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 23:47 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-08 18:07 ` [driver-core PATCH v6 6/9] driver core: Probe devices asynchronously instead of the driver Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 23:59 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-27 2:48 ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 17:57 ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-27 18:32 ` Dan Williams
2018-11-08 18:07 ` [driver-core PATCH v6 7/9] driver core: Attach devices on CPU local to device node Alexander Duyck
2018-11-27 4:50 ` Dan Williams
2018-11-08 18:07 ` [driver-core PATCH v6 8/9] PM core: Use new async_schedule_dev command Alexander Duyck
2018-11-27 4:52 ` Dan Williams
2018-11-08 18:07 ` [driver-core PATCH v6 9/9] libnvdimm: Schedule device registration on node local to the device Alexander Duyck
2018-11-27 2:21 ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 18:04 ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-27 19:34 ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 20:33 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-27 20:50 ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 21:22 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-27 22:34 ` Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181113221014.GB2235@amd \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=zwisler@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).