From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from CAN01-QB1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr660096.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.66.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBBFB20954BBF for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 06:58:45 -0700 (PDT) From: "Stephen Bates" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/11] PCI/P2PDMA: Support peer-to-peer memory Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 14:05:06 +0000 Message-ID: <45A47A71-B435-4DFA-8925-8EB91CEAB230@raithlin.com> References: <3e738f95-d73c-4182-2fa1-8664aafb1ab7@deltatee.com> <703aa92c-0c1c-4852-5887-6f6e6ccde0fb@codeaurora.org> <3ea80992-a0fc-08f2-d93d-ae0ec4e3f4ce@codeaurora.org> <4eb6850c-df1b-fd44-3ee0-d43a50270b53@deltatee.com> <757fca36-dee4-e070-669e-f2788bd78e41@codeaurora.org> <4f761f55-4e9a-dccb-d12f-c59d2cd689db@deltatee.com> <20180313230850.GA45763@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> <8de5d3dd-a78f-02d5-0eea-4365364143b6@deltatee.com> <20180314025639.GA50067@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> In-Reply-To: <20180314025639.GA50067@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> Content-Language: en-US Content-ID: <4EAE1FFD2D16CE4CBB709CC99D67468E@CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-nvdimm-bounces@lists.01.org Sender: "Linux-nvdimm" To: Bjorn Helgaas , Logan Gunthorpe Cc: Jens Axboe , "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" , Alex Williamson , "linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" , "linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" , Sinan Kaya , =?utf-8?B?SsOpcsO0bWUgR2xpc3Nl?= , Jason Gunthorpe , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Bjorn Helgaas , Max Gurtovoy , Keith Busch , Christoph Hellwig List-ID: >I assume you want to exclude Root Ports because of multi-function > devices and the "route to self" error. I was hoping for a reference > to that so I could learn more about it. Apologies Bjorn. This slipped through my net. I will try and get you a reference for RTS in the next couple of days. > While I was looking for it, I found sec 6.12.1.2 (PCIe r4.0), "ACS > Functions in SR-IOV Capable and Multi-Function Devices", which seems > relevant. It talks about "peer-to-peer Requests (between Functions of > the device)". Thay says to me that multi-function devices can DMA > between themselves. I will go take a look. Appreciate the link. Stephen _______________________________________________ Linux-nvdimm mailing list Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm