From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Shivaprasad G Bhat <sbhat@linux.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: nvdimm@lists.linux.dev, aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com,
sbhat@linux.ibm.com, vaibhav@linux.ibm.com,
dan.j.williams@intel.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] powerpc/papr_scm: Move duplicate definitions to common header files
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2021 15:02:18 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sfyfmzhh.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <163092037510.812.12838160593592476913.stgit@82313cf9f602>
Shivaprasad G Bhat <sbhat@linux.ibm.com> writes:
> papr_scm and ndtest share common PDSM payload structs like
> nd_papr_pdsm_health. Presently these structs are duplicated across papr_pdsm.h
> and ndtest.h header files. Since 'ndtest' is essentially arch independent and can
> run on platforms other than PPC64, a way needs to be deviced to avoid redundancy
> and duplication of PDSM structs in future.
>
> So the patch proposes moving the PDSM header from arch/powerpc/include/uapi/ to
> the generic include/uapi/linux directory. Also, there are some #defines common
> between papr_scm and ndtest which are not exported to the user space. So, move
> them to a header file which can be shared across ndtest and papr_scm via newly
> introduced include/linux/papr_scm.h.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shivaprasad G Bhat <sbhat@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.ibm.com>
> Suggested-by: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> Changelog:
>
> Since v1:
> Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-nvdimm/patch/162505488483.72147.12741153746322191381.stgit@56e104a48989/
> * Removed dependency on this patch for the other patches
>
> MAINTAINERS | 2
> arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/papr_pdsm.h | 165 -----------------------------
> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c | 43 --------
> include/linux/papr_scm.h | 48 ++++++++
> include/uapi/linux/papr_pdsm.h | 165 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
This doesn't make sense to me.
Anything with papr (or PAPR) in the name is fundamentally powerpc
specific, it doesn't belong in a generic header, or in a generic
location.
What's the actual problem you're trying to solve?
If it's just including papr_scm bits into ndtest.c then that should be
as simple as:
#ifdef __powerpc__
#include <asm/papr_scm.h>
#endif
Shouldn't it?
cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-08 5:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-06 9:27 [RFC PATCH v2] powerpc/papr_scm: Move duplicate definitions to common header files Shivaprasad G Bhat
2021-09-08 5:02 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2021-09-08 10:46 ` Vaibhav Jain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87sfyfmzhh.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au \
--to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sbhat@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=vaibhav@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).