nvdimm.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Jane Chu <jane.chu@oracle.com>,
	"david@fromorbit.com" <david@fromorbit.com>,
	 "djwong@kernel.org" <djwong@kernel.org>,
	"vishal.l.verma@intel.com" <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
	 "dave.jiang@intel.com" <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
	"agk@redhat.com" <agk@redhat.com>,
	 "snitzer@redhat.com" <snitzer@redhat.com>,
	"dm-devel@redhat.com" <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
	 "ira.weiny@intel.com" <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
	"willy@infradead.org" <willy@infradead.org>,
	 "vgoyal@redhat.com" <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
	 "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	 "nvdimm@lists.linux.dev" <nvdimm@lists.linux.dev>,
	 "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	 "linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/7] dax: introduce dax device flag DAXDEV_RECOVERY
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2022 21:17:08 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4i99BhF+JndtanBuOWRc3eh1C=-CyswhvLDeDSeTHSUZw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yfvb6l/8AJJhRXKs@infradead.org>

On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 5:43 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 09:27:42PM +0000, Jane Chu wrote:
> > Yeah, I see.  Would you suggest a way to pass the indication from
> > dax_iomap_iter to dax_direct_access that the caller intends the
> > callee to ignore poison in the range because the caller intends
> > to do recovery_write? We tried adding a flag to dax_direct_access, and
> > that wasn't liked if I recall.
>
> To me a flag seems cleaner than this magic, but let's wait for Dan to
> chime in.

So back in November I suggested modifying the kaddr, mainly to avoid
touching all the dax_direct_access() call sites [1]. However, now
seeing the code and Chrisoph's comment I think this either wants type
safety (e.g. 'dax_addr_t *'), or just add a new flag. Given both of
those options involve touching all dax_direct_access() call sites and
a @flags operation is more extensible if any other scenarios arrive
lets go ahead and plumb a flag and skip the magic.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-04  5:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-28 21:31 [PATCH v5 0/7] DAX poison recovery Jane Chu
2022-01-28 21:31 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] mce: fix set_mce_nospec to always unmap the whole page Jane Chu
2022-02-02 13:21   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-02 21:20     ` Jane Chu
2022-02-02 23:07       ` Jane Chu
2022-02-03 13:42         ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-04  5:23           ` Dan Williams
2022-02-06  8:30             ` Jane Chu
2022-01-28 21:31 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] dax: introduce dax device flag DAXDEV_RECOVERY Jane Chu
2022-02-02 13:23   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-02 21:27     ` Jane Chu
2022-02-03 13:43       ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-04  5:17         ` Dan Williams [this message]
2022-02-04  5:32           ` Dan Williams
2022-02-06  8:29             ` Jane Chu
2022-01-28 21:31 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] dm: make dm aware of target's DAXDEV_RECOVERY capability Jane Chu
2022-02-04  5:34   ` Dan Williams
2022-02-06  8:27     ` Jane Chu
2022-01-28 21:31 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] dax: add dax_recovery_write to dax_op and dm target type Jane Chu
2022-02-02 13:34   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-02 22:03     ` Jane Chu
2022-02-04  6:03   ` Dan Williams
2022-02-06  8:25     ` Jane Chu
2022-01-28 21:31 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] pmem: add pmem_recovery_write() dax op Jane Chu
2022-02-02 13:43   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-02 22:13     ` Jane Chu
2022-02-04  6:21   ` Dan Williams
2022-02-06  8:08     ` Jane Chu
2022-01-28 21:31 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] dax: add recovery_write to dax_iomap_iter in failure path Jane Chu
2022-02-02 13:44   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-02 22:18     ` Jane Chu
2022-01-28 21:31 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] pmem: fix pmem_do_write() avoid writing to 'np' page Jane Chu
2022-02-02 13:28   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-02 21:31     ` Jane Chu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAPcyv4i99BhF+JndtanBuOWRc3eh1C=-CyswhvLDeDSeTHSUZw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=jane.chu@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).