From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pf1-f179.google.com (mail-pf1-f179.google.com [209.85.210.179]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 463F93FEE for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 22:03:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pf1-f179.google.com with SMTP id v123so2976185pfb.11 for ; Thu, 09 Sep 2021 15:03:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=tUxwV6XCqqMFLWzFgkmAURBDJPUK/ez7E/Hfrb4Mumg=; b=evxYXoGg4eg8cWiXuzfXe/L4RVHHKvaWSH0l4/IBgGEeaeS1SGWmzqcM5KM7qEOgci gOAF7ndJTA2njgP4/uurVsaxm8HhUAbHfyVJ/YAEjHlJA2tKz2bCt+xUyXk5kHq5vmk2 IAC3e2/WnSEjckeKLrfCDNPsbenOxtbina4c3SAExPEyJCDMGiZ7QI5ZzMagwRan5DnB OK4QKr+u/ofqbNBL9o5eHGdJ8Qd208EYIV11Hh4mFh/0z5dy6DhXGMVjPrKuRa0TMLou N0dPiGPcF9gFU/aVHM9k8YsXoWL7o/HJwYEiaIQWtDCEXf/EqDnHaW6gzlQ7D4FKsco9 e5IA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=tUxwV6XCqqMFLWzFgkmAURBDJPUK/ez7E/Hfrb4Mumg=; b=gu75N9BFYvJB0ZnQJnPwU+QsSLNBCs3vhTtgWZt9uKpr+V6Mq7ceJvIaDxX81N4/K4 6ZYYkbJezw3WxvBYOoCggNwFkNbqs7T7ShRQ8BFLlXuoPczCpseta1dZpD2kGAIt1Urd IN3fE7XQ8RrmuyHFAyW7RYNC+sRNpF6ukxZdonXVH9B79miriHpsOVmOW/iCLdSyi1Su O4hmooLbSlgq8tPtIUN9NG2qbcZJZJkG2ZSph7fMYMLge2gN8Vif8TK0g6OexOmkKFR7 hE1RsKTRGPdFOfPfpteUyswDoUzWuBMAjLTW4O+kE5wpOiKrI3bK1rXjQ/IO/BcxqM/V MAKQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531mnbBOm48fXxMHopGGvlcBMLKB/s0+lwaGUHLot9hGM4v0WjYV M+OTrkLm/+4AFPCmIqiONWDL12t6gzmSVc4xsds/uQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwN4VkDehh5MoaNKQCkMxukEOavBsC4R75tW1GnnbiLuwe6PWvWWw5a5uQ+t10mDLPngeuM4992FD+g/SD/x7g= X-Received: by 2002:a62:1b92:0:b0:3eb:3f92:724 with SMTP id b140-20020a621b92000000b003eb3f920724mr4971964pfb.3.1631225035680; Thu, 09 Sep 2021 15:03:55 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: nvdimm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <163116429183.2460985.5040982981112374615.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> <163116437978.2460985.6298243237502084824.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <163116437978.2460985.6298243237502084824.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> From: Dan Williams Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2021 15:03:45 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 16/21] cxl/pmem: Add support for multiple nvdimm-bridge objects To: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org Cc: Ben Widawsky , Vishal L Verma , Linux NVDIMM , "Schofield, Alison" , "Weiny, Ira" , Jonathan Cameron Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 10:13 PM Dan Williams wrote: > > In preparation for a mocked unit test environment for CXL objects, allow > for multiple unique nvdimm-bridge objects. > > For now, just allow multiple bridges to be registered. Later, when there > are multiple present, further updates are needed to > cxl_find_nvdimm_bridge() to identify which bridge is associated with > which CXL hierarchy for nvdimm registration. > > Note that this does change the kernel device-name for the bridge object. > User space should not have any attachment to the device name at this > point as it is still early days in the CXL driver development. Apologies Jonathan, missed your: Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron here...