From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pj1-f48.google.com (mail-pj1-f48.google.com [209.85.216.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B5C32C82 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 03:48:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pj1-f48.google.com with SMTP id gx15-20020a17090b124f00b001a695f3734aso1385769pjb.0 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 19:48:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=BQpMJpPq/OIJ1A+jReESOD3pvkOjXmQh8KJADyXTrz8=; b=jKMXPC6R380cNIQ/lk6QhOIiLqsp4XKj1eRLbWdIfXDMXjf2sFtM/A4DNKzZle92lO 3U1GnSeEGBEEzHeeSOTcj6e6Hlhrl2Cgom3C+oy6m84LroLIm83mhibtNhOC9a7kpuLa ouXLOQwDClItscEUt0Jtcfsiacpxarhj3trqquFBkBV1VRiZIUVoCcdmCugOwJ+8mJs6 RFqDPmjgXZyOm3EQaprR9sZoOXJ0YQXXHWkXXD+DsFaSM6qnnUL3vYnF49/xzscWLZfD M7pqOQ9uH/J1/XHGYxb48lxo0PQegLqWhqBsHyRYBVi7oUWjdYWmqFepS80LAFQdqtcA s5yA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=BQpMJpPq/OIJ1A+jReESOD3pvkOjXmQh8KJADyXTrz8=; b=0RCNkV8xvvPoOMIm7nGWKjONwuNmYwKKy8L8V0DXRo1SNIhdkeo9d8H1Lm2bm+P4z+ T2dC257CxCogOU3lUSptCsiSBB4oGS4a5oyMVqEH2fcGcu36utAk3xT/FJqrBt/Zg617 d/7NMZC+5X4aKUzkLHUeN1dS19ZiG+NyoLVs6v7WDRHyFWU0Pa5ZRLnQSj30l9EvU3WO pXHorPEfe49NoX9ltNkIwyHKxIEacLiZRfq+1kwA7YRBSeEjy/8qqbRAL3e9V6Xkde4F hq48HnaWk1T8vZZLACzlG4C36Uue3moBNtwLBvJdIbNlAy0UNK+T8wArkO1hB0aThc3J X0aA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531vm8VOpcTL1yw/AVbbW53AhqO3SEVIjaVgCSXzehEMxmxAxI/t 6994BjRO3Re96eSS1OMHk0HnpFBgK0BHkRE73trmsQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwXdBqxRTwwq0bi38HdemI3/UrUSQvkef2geUCQrgUs13GwLl6CkzHERiNWivJH+HCOX6YcKKMcXBwB2wDg59I= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:6acb:b0:142:76c3:d35f with SMTP id i11-20020a1709026acb00b0014276c3d35fmr13991510plt.89.1637725682824; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 19:48:02 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: nvdimm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211109083309.584081-1-hch@lst.de> <20211109083309.584081-28-hch@lst.de> In-Reply-To: <20211109083309.584081-28-hch@lst.de> From: Dan Williams Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 19:47:52 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 27/29] dax: fix up some of the block device related ifdefs To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Mike Snitzer , Ira Weiny , device-mapper development , linux-xfs , Linux NVDIMM , linux-s390 , linux-fsdevel , linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-ext4 , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 12:34 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > The DAX device <-> block device association is only enabled if > CONFIG_BLOCK is enabled. Update dax.h to account for that and use > the right conditions for the fs_put_dax stub as well. Looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Dan Williams > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig