RE: [PATCH RESEND v6 1/9] pagemap: Introduce ->memory_failure()

["ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com" <ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com>]

> From: Jane Chu <jane.chu@oracle.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v6 1/9] pagemap: Introduce ->memory_failure()
> 
> Sorry, correction in line.
> 
> On 8/19/2021 12:18 AM, Jane Chu wrote:
> > Hi, Shiyang,
> >
> >  >  > > 1) What does it take and cost to make  >  > >
> > xfs_sb_version_hasrmapbt(&mp->m_sb) to return true?
> >  >
> >  > Enable rmpabt feature when making xfs filesystem  >     `mkfs.xfs
> > -m rmapbt=1 /path/to/device`  > BTW, reflink is enabled by default.
> >
> > Thanks!  I tried
> > mkfs.xfs -d agcount=2,extszinherit=512,su=2m,sw=1 -m reflink=0 -m
> > rmapbt=1 -f /dev/pmem0
> >
> > Again, injected a HW poison to the first page in a dax-file, had the
> > poison consumed and received a SIGBUS. The result is better -
> >
> > ** SIGBUS(7): canjmp=1, whichstep=0, **
> > ** si_addr(0x0x7ff2d8800000), si_lsb(0x15), si_code(0x4,
> > BUS_MCEERR_AR) **
> >
> > The SIGBUS payload looks correct.
> >
> > However, "dmesg" has 2048 lines on sending SIGBUS, one per 512bytes -
> 
> Actually that's one per 2MB, even though the poison is located in pfn 0x1850600
> only.
> 
> >
> > [ 7003.482326] Memory failure: 0x1850600: Sending SIGBUS to
> > fsdax_poison_v1:4109 due to hardware memory corruption [ 7003.507956]
> > Memory failure: 0x1850800: Sending SIGBUS to
> > fsdax_poison_v1:4109 due to hardware memory corruption [ 7003.531681]
> > Memory failure: 0x1850a00: Sending SIGBUS to
> > fsdax_poison_v1:4109 due to hardware memory corruption [ 7003.554190]
> > Memory failure: 0x1850c00: Sending SIGBUS to
> > fsdax_poison_v1:4109 due to hardware memory corruption [ 7003.575831]
> > Memory failure: 0x1850e00: Sending SIGBUS to
> > fsdax_poison_v1:4109 due to hardware memory corruption [ 7003.596796]
> > Memory failure: 0x1851000: Sending SIGBUS to
> > fsdax_poison_v1:4109 due to hardware memory corruption ....
> > [ 7045.738270] Memory failure: 0x194fe00: Sending SIGBUS to
> > fsdax_poison_v1:4109 due to hardware memory corruption [ 7045.758885]
> > Memory failure: 0x1950000: Sending SIGBUS to
> > fsdax_poison_v1:4109 due to hardware memory corruption [ 7045.779495]
> > Memory failure: 0x1950200: Sending SIGBUS to
> > fsdax_poison_v1:4109 due to hardware memory corruption [ 7045.800106]
> > Memory failure: 0x1950400: Sending SIGBUS to
> > fsdax_poison_v1:4109 due to hardware memory corruption
> >
> > That's too much for a single process dealing with a single poison in a
> > PMD page. If nothing else, given an .si_addr_lsb being 0x15, it
> > doesn't make sense to send a SIGBUS per 512B block.
> >
> > Could you determine the user process' mapping size from the
> > filesystem, and take that as a hint to determine how many iterations
> > to call
> > mf_dax_kill_procs() ?
> 
> Sorry, scratch the 512byte stuff... the filesystem has been notified the length of
> the poison blast radius, could it take clue from that?

I think this is caused by a mistake I made in the 6th patch: xfs handler iterates the file range in block size(4k here) even though it is a PMD page. That's why so many message shows when poison on a PMD page.  I'll fix it in next version.


--
Thanks,
Ruan.

> 
> thanks,
> -jane
> 
> >
> > thanks!
> > -jane
> >
> >
> >