Re: [PATCH v10 2/9] mm: factor helpers for memory_failure_dev_pagemap

[Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>]

On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 08:40:51PM +0800, Shiyang Ruan wrote:
> +static int mf_generic_kill_procs(unsigned long long pfn, int flags,
> +		struct dev_pagemap *pgmap)
> +{
> +	struct page *page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
> +	LIST_HEAD(to_kill);
> +	dax_entry_t cookie;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Prevent the inode from being freed while we are interrogating
> +	 * the address_space, typically this would be handled by
> +	 * lock_page(), but dax pages do not use the page lock. This
> +	 * also prevents changes to the mapping of this pfn until
> +	 * poison signaling is complete.
> +	 */
> +	cookie = dax_lock_page(page);
> +	if (!cookie)
> +		return -EBUSY;
> +
> +	if (hwpoison_filter(page))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	if (pgmap->type == MEMORY_DEVICE_PRIVATE) {
> +		/*
> +		 * TODO: Handle HMM pages which may need coordination
> +		 * with device-side memory.
> +		 */
> +		return -EBUSY;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Use this flag as an indication that the dax page has been
> +	 * remapped UC to prevent speculative consumption of poison.
> +	 */
> +	SetPageHWPoison(page);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Unlike System-RAM there is no possibility to swap in a
> +	 * different physical page at a given virtual address, so all
> +	 * userspace consumption of ZONE_DEVICE memory necessitates
> +	 * SIGBUS (i.e. MF_MUST_KILL)
> +	 */
> +	flags |= MF_ACTION_REQUIRED | MF_MUST_KILL;
> +	collect_procs(page, &to_kill, true);
> +
> +	unmap_and_kill(&to_kill, pfn, page->mapping, page->index, flags);
> +	dax_unlock_page(page, cookie);
> +	return 0;
> +}

There's an assumption here that fsdax only has order-0 pages.
pfn_to_page() is going to return the precise page for that pfn, but then
page->mapping and page->index are not valid for tail pages.

I'm currently trying to folio-ise memory-failure.c, and it is not
going well!  There are several places where it's hard to tell
what should happen.