From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 17:32:16 -0700 Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v11 16/25] fs: Convert mpage_readpages to mpage_readahead In-Reply-To: References: <20200414150233.24495-1-willy@infradead.org> <20200414150233.24495-17-willy@infradead.org> Message-ID: <20200617003216.GC8681@bombadil.infradead.org> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Andreas Gruenbacher Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Junxiao Bi , William Kucharski , Joseph Qi , John Hubbard , LKML , linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, cluster-devel , Linux-MM , ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, linux-fsdevel , linux-ext4 , linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, Christoph Hellwig , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, Steven Whitehouse , Bob Peterson On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 12:36:13AM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > Am Mi., 15. Apr. 2020 um 23:39 Uhr schrieb Matthew Wilcox : > > From: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" > > > > Implement the new readahead aop and convert all callers (block_dev, > > exfat, ext2, fat, gfs2, hpfs, isofs, jfs, nilfs2, ocfs2, omfs, qnx6, > > reiserfs & udf). The callers are all trivial except for GFS2 & OCFS2. > > This patch leads to an ABBA deadlock in xfstest generic/095 on gfs2. > > Our lock hierarchy is such that the inode cluster lock ("inode glock") > for an inode needs to be taken before any page locks in that inode's > address space. How does that work for ... writepage: yes, unlocks (see below) readpage: yes, unlocks invalidatepage: yes releasepage: yes freepage: yes isolate_page: yes migratepage: yes (both) putback_page: yes launder_page: yes is_partially_uptodate: yes error_remove_page: yes Is there a reason that you don't take the glock in the higher level ops which are called before readhead gets called? I'm looking at XFS, and it takes the xfs_ilock SHARED in xfs_file_buffered_aio_read() (called from xfs_file_read_iter). Not that after -rc1 is a great time to be upending the locking model in a filesystem ... but then, this has been baking in -mm for ten weeks and the GFS2 mailing list has been on the cc for the patches for five months, so I don't have a lot of sympathy for this.