[Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH v2 11/14] ufs: replace ll_rw_block()

[Zhang Yi via Ocfs2-devel <ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com>]

ll_rw_block() is not safe for the sync read path because it cannot
guarantee that submitting read IO if the buffer has been locked. We
could get false positive EIO after wait_on_buffer() if the buffer has
been locked by others. So stop using ll_rw_block() in ufs.

Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
---
 fs/ufs/balloc.c | 12 ++++--------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ufs/balloc.c b/fs/ufs/balloc.c
index bd810d8239f2..2436e3f82147 100644
--- a/fs/ufs/balloc.c
+++ b/fs/ufs/balloc.c
@@ -295,14 +295,10 @@ static void ufs_change_blocknr(struct inode *inode, sector_t beg,
 
 			if (!buffer_mapped(bh))
 					map_bh(bh, inode->i_sb, oldb + pos);
-			if (!buffer_uptodate(bh)) {
-				ll_rw_block(REQ_OP_READ, 1, &bh);
-				wait_on_buffer(bh);
-				if (!buffer_uptodate(bh)) {
-					ufs_error(inode->i_sb, __func__,
-						  "read of block failed\n");
-					break;
-				}
+			if (bh_read(bh, 0) < 0) {
+				ufs_error(inode->i_sb, __func__,
+					  "read of block failed\n");
+				break;
 			}
 
 			UFSD(" change from %llu to %llu, pos %u\n",
-- 
2.31.1


_______________________________________________
Ocfs2-devel mailing list
Ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel