From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 15:56:16 -0700
Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 1/4] ocfs2: avoid inode removed while nfsd
	access it
In-Reply-To: <20200617135743.18d9a4add21acaac12da23d2@linux-foundation.org>
References: <20200616183829.87211-1-junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
	<20200616183829.87211-2-junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
	<b8f64191-74fc-0f15-affc-e8e518b17bd1@linux.alibaba.com>
	<20200617135743.18d9a4add21acaac12da23d2@linux-foundation.org>
Message-ID: <35ad57f5-974b-ee24-c649-18a22a33a65f@oracle.com>
List-Id: <ocfs2-devel.oss.oracle.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com


On 6/17/20 1:57 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 11:01:12 +0800 Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2020/6/17 02:38, Junxiao Bi wrote:
>>> When nfsd is getting file dentry using handle or parent dentry of some
>>> dentry, one cluster lock is used to avoid inode removed from other node,
>>> but it still could be removed from local node, so use a rw lock to avoid
>>> this.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
> Which kernel version(s) do we think need these four patches?  5.9?
> 5.8?  5.8 and -stable?

sorry, forgot cc stable, all stable kernel will need these fixes.

Thanks,

Junxiao.