From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joe Perches Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 04:51:26 -0700 Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 20/33] ipv4: add ip_sock_set_recverr In-Reply-To: <20200514103025.GB12680@lst.de> References: <20200513062649.2100053-1-hch@lst.de> <20200513062649.2100053-21-hch@lst.de> <0ee5acfaca4cf32d4efad162046b858981a4dae3.camel@perches.com> <20200514103025.GB12680@lst.de> Message-ID: <9992a1fe768a0b1e9bb9470d2728ba25dbe042db.camel@perches.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Eric Dumazet , Alexey Kuznetsov , Hideaki YOSHIFUJI , Vlad Yasevich , Neil Horman , Marcelo Ricardo Leitner , Jon Maloy , Ying Xue , drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, target-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, cluster-devel@redhat.com, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, rds-devel On Thu, 2020-05-14 at 12:30 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 02:00:43PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Wed, 2020-05-13 at 08:26 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > Add a helper to directly set the IP_RECVERR sockopt from kernel space > > > without going through a fake uaccess. > > > > This seems used only with true as the second arg. > > Is there reason to have that argument at all? > > Mostly to keep it symmetric with the sockopt. I could probably remove > a few arguments in the series if we want to be strict. My preference would use strict and add arguments only when necessary.