From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25DCDC433DB for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 02:42:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from userp2130.oracle.com (userp2130.oracle.com [156.151.31.86]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 569FF64EDC for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 02:42:30 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 569FF64EDC Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ocfs2-devel-bounces@oss.oracle.com Received: from pps.filterd (userp2130.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2130.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 11Q2ZfAb051018; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 02:42:28 GMT Received: from userp3020.oracle.com (userp3020.oracle.com [156.151.31.79]) by userp2130.oracle.com with ESMTP id 36tsur8jbr-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 26 Feb 2021 02:42:27 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (userp3020.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp3020.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 11Q2aGba142812; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 02:42:27 GMT Received: from oss.oracle.com (oss-old-reserved.oracle.com [137.254.22.2]) by userp3020.oracle.com with ESMTP id 36uc6vap3w-1 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 26 Feb 2021 02:42:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lb-oss.oracle.com) by oss.oracle.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1lFT5G-0004cE-Dl; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 18:42:26 -0800 Received: from aserp3020.oracle.com ([141.146.126.70]) by oss.oracle.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1lFT4l-0004bE-14 for ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 18:41:55 -0800 Received: from pps.filterd (aserp3020.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp3020.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 11Q2YlOw142531 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 02:41:54 GMT Received: from userp2040.oracle.com (userp2040.oracle.com [156.151.31.90]) by aserp3020.oracle.com with ESMTP id 36ucb2v0x1-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 02:41:54 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (userp2040.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2040.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 11Q2WrVQ046427 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 02:41:53 GMT Received: from out30-44.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-44.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.44]) by userp2040.oracle.com with ESMTP id 36wskfh7hv-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 02:41:53 +0000 X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS; BC=-1|-1; BR=01201311R621e4; CH=green; DM=||false|; DS=||; FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1; HT=e01e04395; MF=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com; NM=1; PH=DS; RN=3; SR=0; TI=SMTPD_---0UPbSN-p_1614307306; Received: from B-D1K7ML85-0059.local(mailfrom:joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0UPbSN-p_1614307306) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Fri, 26 Feb 2021 10:41:46 +0800 To: "Lentes, Bernd" , Wengang Wang References: <1884783914.58523079.1614110913964.JavaMail.zimbra@helmholtz-muenchen.de> <01866DBC-59D3-4D41-B404-C76FCA6B6221@oracle.com> <834203578.59367045.1614157887078.JavaMail.zimbra@helmholtz-muenchen.de> <923372681.62923711.1614256785266.JavaMail.zimbra@helmholtz-muenchen.de> <4CCBAF2C-837A-41B9-BA87-825C5AEC0501@oracle.com> <603384094.63786431.1614286118678.JavaMail.zimbra@helmholtz-muenchen.de> From: Joseph Qi Message-ID: Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 10:41:45 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <603384094.63786431.1614286118678.JavaMail.zimbra@helmholtz-muenchen.de> Content-Language: en-US X-PDR: PASS X-Source-IP: 115.124.30.44 X-ServerName: out30-44.freemail.mail.aliyun.com X-Proofpoint-SPF-Result: pass X-Proofpoint-SPF-Record: v=spf1 include:spf1.service.alibaba.com include:spf2.service.alibaba.com include:spf1.ocm.aliyun.com include:spf2.ocm.aliyun.com include:spf1.staff.mail.aliyun.com include:a.hichina.mail.aliyun.com include:b.hichina.mail.aliyun.com -all X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6200 definitions=9906 signatures=668683 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=tap_notspam policy=tap score=0 spamscore=0 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 phishscore=0 priorityscore=70 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 clxscore=233 impostorscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2102260019 X-Spam: Clean Cc: ocfs2-devel Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-devel] error message in log: ocfs2_reflink_ioctl:4431 ERROR: status = -17 X-BeenThere: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: ocfs2-devel-bounces@oss.oracle.com Errors-To: ocfs2-devel-bounces@oss.oracle.com X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6200 definitions=9906 signatures=668683 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2102260020 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6200 definitions=9906 signatures=668683 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 spamscore=0 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 clxscore=1034 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2102260020 On 2/26/21 4:48 AM, Lentes, Bernd wrote: > Hi, > > what we do is to overwrite the reflink from the day before with the current one, with the same name. > For this we use reflink -f. Could that be the culprit ? > Should we delete the old one before ? Or maybe use unique names for each reflink ? I think you are doing so is to take a file snapshot. So a unique name for each snapshot looks more reasonable, since you can find the most suitable backup you want. Generally filename + timestamp is commonly used for this situation. Thanks, Joseph _______________________________________________ Ocfs2-devel mailing list Ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel