From: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Wengang Wang <wen.gang.wang@oracle.com>
Cc: Chenyuan Mi <cymi20@fudan.edu.cn>, Xin Tan <tanxin.ctf@gmail.com>,
Xiyu Yang <xiyuyang19@fudan.edu.cn>,
"yuanxzhang@fudan.edu.cn" <yuanxzhang@fudan.edu.cn>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com" <ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH v2] ocfs2: Fix handle refcount leak in two exception handling paths
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2021 19:07:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c48fb54e-0dd9-42c7-f53d-2ea58fb97255@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6018AF95-3613-4D43-A3E6-7BAA0E0BE009@oracle.com>
Hi Wengang,
On 9/9/21 1:12 AM, Wengang Wang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry for late involving, but this doesn’t look right to me.
>
>> On Sep 8, 2021, at 3:51 AM, Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 9/8/21 6:20 PM, Chenyuan Mi wrote:
>>> The reference counting issue happens in two exception handling paths
>>> of ocfs2_replay_truncate_records(). When executing these two exception
>>> handling paths, the function forgets to decrease the refcount of handle
>>> increased by ocfs2_start_trans(), causing a refcount leak.
>>>
>>> Fix this issue by using ocfs2_commit_trans() to decrease the refcount
>>> of handle in two handling paths.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chenyuan Mi <cymi20@fudan.edu.cn>
>>> Signed-off-by: Xiyu Yang <xiyuyang19@fudan.edu.cn>
>>> Signed-off-by: Xin Tan <tanxin.ctf@gmail.com>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
>>> ---
>>> fs/ocfs2/alloc.c | 2 ++
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c b/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
>>> index f1cc8258d34a..b05fde7edc3a 100644
>>> --- a/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
>>> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
>>> @@ -5940,6 +5940,7 @@ static int ocfs2_replay_truncate_records(struct ocfs2_super *osb,
>>> status = ocfs2_journal_access_di(handle, INODE_CACHE(tl_inode), tl_bh,
>>> OCFS2_JOURNAL_ACCESS_WRITE);
>>> if (status < 0) {
>>> + ocfs2_commit_trans(osb, handle);
>>> mlog_errno(status);
>>> goto bail;
>>> }
>>> @@ -5964,6 +5965,7 @@ static int ocfs2_replay_truncate_records(struct ocfs2_super *osb,
>>> data_alloc_bh, start_blk,
>>> num_clusters);
>>> if (status < 0) {
>>> + ocfs2_commit_trans(osb, handle);
>
> As a transaction, stuff expected to be in the same handle should be treated as atomic.
> Here the stuff includes the tl_bh and other metadata block which will be modified in ocfs2_free_clusters().
> Coming here, some of related meta blocks may be in the handle but others are not due to the error happened.
> If you do a commit, partial meta blocks are committed to log. — that breaks the atomic idea, it will cause FS inconsistency.
> So what’s reason you want to commit the meta block changes, which is not all of expected, in this handle to journal log?
>
> Do you really see a hit on the failure? or just you detected the refcount leak by code review?
>
> You may want to look at ocfs2_journal_dirty() for the error handling part.
>
For the first error handling, since we don't call ocfs2_journal_dirty()
yet, so won't be a problem.
For the second error handling, I think we don't have a better way. Look
at other callers of ocfs2_free_clusters(), we simply ignore the error
code.
Anyway, we should commit transaction if starts, otherwise journal will
be abnormal.
Thanks,
Joseph
_______________________________________________
Ocfs2-devel mailing list
Ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-09 11:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-08 10:20 [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH v2] ocfs2: Fix handle refcount leak in two exception handling paths Chenyuan Mi
2021-09-08 10:51 ` Joseph Qi
2021-09-08 17:12 ` Wengang Wang
2021-09-09 11:07 ` Joseph Qi [this message]
2021-09-09 17:48 ` Wengang Wang
2021-09-10 1:53 ` Joseph Qi
2021-09-10 17:00 ` Wengang Wang
2021-09-14 2:12 ` Joseph Qi
2021-09-14 3:07 ` Wengang Wang
2021-09-15 2:36 ` Joseph Qi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c48fb54e-0dd9-42c7-f53d-2ea58fb97255@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=cymi20@fudan.edu.cn \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
--cc=tanxin.ctf@gmail.com \
--cc=wen.gang.wang@oracle.com \
--cc=xiyuyang19@fudan.edu.cn \
--cc=yuanxzhang@fudan.edu.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).