ocfs2-devel.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Gang He <ghe@suse.com>, mark@fasheh.com, jlbec@evilplan.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2: fix potential soft lockup during fstrim
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2020 10:59:38 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cd133863-e81e-69f3-74da-bac4f52beb21@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200927015815.14904-1-ghe@suse.com>



On 2020/9/27 09:58, Gang He wrote:
> When we discard unused blocks on a mounted ocfs2 filesystem, fstrim
> handles each block goup with locking/unlocking global bitmap meta-file
> repeatedly. we should let fstrim thread take a break(if need) between
> unlock and lock, this will avoid the potential soft lockup problem,
> and also gives the upper applications more IO opportunities, these
> applications are not blocked for too long at writing files.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gang He <ghe@suse.com>

It makes sense.
Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>

> ---
>  fs/ocfs2/alloc.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c b/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
> index 4c1b90442d6f..2cf9321919b5 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
> @@ -7654,8 +7654,10 @@ int ocfs2_trim_mainbm(struct super_block *sb, struct fstrim_range *range)
>  	 * main_bm related locks for avoiding the current IO starve, then go to
>  	 * trim the next group
>  	 */
> -	if (ret >= 0 && group <= last_group)
> +	if (ret >= 0 && group <= last_group) {
> +		cond_resched();
>  		goto next_group;
> +	}
>  out:
>  	range->len = trimmed * sb->s_blocksize;
>  	return ret;
> 

      reply	other threads:[~2020-09-27  2:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-27  1:58 [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2: fix potential soft lockup during fstrim Gang He
2020-09-27  2:59 ` Joseph Qi [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cd133863-e81e-69f3-74da-bac4f52beb21@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ghe@suse.com \
    --cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark@fasheh.com \
    --cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).