oe-chipsec.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Darren Bilby <darrenbilby@gmail.com>
To: chipsec@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [Luv] Results and a few questions
Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2015 17:41:02 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFzMC=maSUJxoAa8mLP1NBzNUKdZOos6LzEN7i0FPFCOOTijyA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F2C8915217E2664AB33302D7A9ED9C0A35DA73C4@hasmsx107.ger.corp.intel.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7513 bytes --]

Hi John,
1.2.2 does fix the xml file issue and I think it should work in LUV as is
(although I haven't tested).

I assume the pull request you refer to is
https://github.com/chipsec/chipsec/pull/11 ? That helps solve the issue of
chipsec expecting the xml files to be in a particular place, which
currently prevents us using the setup.py in a virtualenv or using it as an
egg (https://github.com/chipsec/chipsec/issues/12).

Thanks, Darren

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 10:09 AM, Loucaides, John <john.loucaides@intel.com>
wrote:

> Darren, would you mind checking 1.2.2 to see if setup.py works, now?
>
>
>
> I see a pull request that does more… trying to figure out if 1.2.2 is
> still broken, though.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> -          John
>
>
>
> *From:* Darren Bilby [mailto:darrenbilby(a)gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 28, 2015 11:13 PM
> *To:* Loucaides, John <john.loucaides@intel.com>; Ricardo Neri <
> ricardo.neri-calderon(a)linux.intel.com>; kusuriya(a)corrupted.io
>
> *Cc:* chipsec(a)lists.01.org; luv(a)lists.01.org
> *Subject:* Re: [chipsec] [Luv] Results and a few questions
>
>
>
> I originally discovered the issue when attempting to build a chipsec egg
> file as part of work to make it useful in github.com/google/grr. Build of
> an egg uses the same setup.py so had the same issue with the lack of xml
> files.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 4:54 PM Loucaides, John <john.loucaides@intel.com>
> wrote:
>
> Interesting… I’m looking into this. We’re trying to finish up a 1.2.2
> release, and I plan to go through the pull requests over the next day or
> two.
>
>
>
> Btw, have you seen bugs related to setup.py outside LUV as well?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> -          John
>
>
>
> *From:* chipsec [mailto:chipsec-bounces(a)lists.01.org] *On Behalf Of *Darren
> Bilby
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 28, 2015 5:55 PM
> *To:* Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>;
> kusuriya(a)corrupted.io
> *Cc:* chipsec(a)lists.01.org; luv(a)lists.01.org
> *Subject:* Re: [chipsec] [Luv] Results and a few questions
>
>
>
> I'm actually not convinced Chipsec on LUV has ever worked.
>
> The configuration in setup.py for Chipsec doesn't include the XML files in
> the deployment, thus no XML files in LUV, and therefore the errors.
>
> There is a fix for it in a pull request here
> https://github.com/chipsec/chipsec/pull/7 but there are a bunch of other
> very old pull requests that don't seem to be being looked at.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 9:26 AM Ricardo Neri <
> ricardo.neri-calderon(a)linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> Actually including the CHIPSEC mailing list this time.
> On Mon, 2015-10-26 at 19:51 +0000, Neri, Ricardo wrote:
> > +CHIPSEC mailing list
> >
> > Hi Jason,
> >
> > Thanks for your report.
> >
> > On Mon, 2015-10-26 at 12:04 -0700, Jason Barbier wrote:
> > > Hey all,
> > > I ran LUV-Live and my results are attached as a zip, I sort of was
> > > wondering about the errors in the chipsec log though,
> > > These were similar errors that I got last week that caused some issues
> > > with my clock being reset using version 1.2, the latest RC seems to not
> > > do that but It still can not seem to run all the tests.
> > >
> > > --
> > > WARNING: 'SPIBAR' MMIO BAR definition not found/correct in XML config
> > > [pci] reading B/D/F: 0/31/0, offset: 0xF0, value: 0xFED1C001
> > > [spi] SPI MMIO base: 0x00000000FED1F800 (assuming below 4GB)
> > > [spi] SPI MMIO base: 0x00000000FED1F800 (assuming below 4GB)
> > > [-] Traceback (most recent call last):
> > >   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/chipsec_main.py", line 291, in
> > >   run_module
> > >     result = modx.run( module_argv )
> > >   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/chipsec/module.py", line 69,
> in
> > >   run
> > >     result = self.get_module_object()
> > >   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/chipsec/module.py", line 101,
> > >   in get_module_object
> > >     self.mod_obj = iref()
> > >   File
> > >   "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/chipsec/modules/common/bios_wp.py",
> > >   line 51, in __init__
> > >     self.spi    = SPI( self.cs )
> > >   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/chipsec/hal/spi.py", line 176,
> > >   in __init__
> > >     self.hsfs_off   = int(chipsec.chipset.get_register_def( self.cs,
> > >     "HSFS" )['offset'],16)
> > >   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/chipsec/chipset.py", line 467,
> > >   in get_register_def
> > >     return _cs.Cfg.REGISTERS[ reg_name ]
> > > KeyError: 'HSFS'
> > > --
> > > [-] Traceback (most recent call last):
> > >   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/chipsec_main.py", line 291, in
> > >   run_module
> > >     result = modx.run( module_argv )
> > >   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/chipsec/module.py", line 80,
> in
> > >   run
> > >     result = self.mod_obj.run(module_argv)
> > >   File
> > >
>  "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/chipsec/modules/common/spi_desc.py",
> > >   line 68, in run
> > >     return self.check_flash_access_permissions()
> > >   File
> > >
>  "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/chipsec/modules/common/spi_desc.py",
> > >   line 48, in check_flash_access_permissions
> > >     frap = chipsec.chipset.read_register( self.cs, 'FRAP' )
> > >   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/chipsec/chipset.py", line 470,
> > >   in read_register
> > >     reg = _cs.Cfg.REGISTERS[ reg_name ]
> > > KeyError: 'FRAP'
> > >
> > > ERROR: Exception occurred during chipsec.modules.common.spi_desc.run():
> > > ''FRAP''
> > > --
> > > [-] Traceback (most recent call last):
> > >   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/chipsec_main.py", line 291, in
> > >   run_module
> > >     result = modx.run( module_argv )
> > >   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/chipsec/module.py", line 80,
> in
> > >   run
> > >     result = self.mod_obj.run(module_argv)
> > >   File
> > >
>  "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/chipsec/modules/common/spi_lock.py",
> > >   line 59, in run
> > >     return self.check_spi_lock()
> > >   File
> > >
>  "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/chipsec/modules/common/spi_lock.py",
> > >   line 46, in check_spi_lock
> > >     hsfs_reg = chipsec.chipset.read_register( self.cs, 'HSFS' )
> > >   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/chipsec/chipset.py", line 470,
> > >   in read_register
> > >     reg = _cs.Cfg.REGISTERS[ reg_name ]
> > > KeyError: 'HSFS'
> > >
> > > ERROR: Exception occurred during chipsec.modules.common.spi_lock.run():
> > > ''HSFS''
> > > --
> > >
> > I added the CHIPSEC mailing list. Perhaps they can give further insight
> > on what the problem might be.
> >
> > As per LUV, it seems that this exception somehow caused a crash in the
> > LUV test manager and it prevented it from running the tests of the
> > tests. It seems we need to add some safeguards so that LUV can handle
> > these errors more gracefully.
> >
> > Thanks and BR,
> > Ricardo
> >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Luv mailing list
> > > Luv(a)lists.01.org
> > > https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/luv
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Luv mailing list
> > Luv(a)lists.01.org
> > https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/luv
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> chipsec mailing list
> chipsec(a)lists.01.org
> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/chipsec
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: attachment.html --]
[-- Type: text/html, Size: 14512 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2015-12-04  6:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1445889065.29566.56.camel@ranerica-desk01>
2015-10-28 22:25 ` [Luv] Results and a few questions Ricardo Neri
2015-10-29  0:54   ` Darren Bilby
2015-10-29  5:54     ` Loucaides, John
2015-10-29  6:12       ` Darren Bilby
2015-12-02 23:09         ` Loucaides, John
2015-12-04  6:41           ` Darren Bilby [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAFzMC=maSUJxoAa8mLP1NBzNUKdZOos6LzEN7i0FPFCOOTijyA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=darrenbilby@gmail.com \
    --cc=chipsec@lists.01.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).