From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88CB37F; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 00:02:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.11 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1705449766; cv=none; b=PqrWtj7QYtJtpTL8ik9QDnT9Mjik5Ke/L7mvn3+5ez0jsnOxNTwPwmzqTjlKZk312k+maF4EnsUwUnuppzYf8MV4gpjtVYNtkGeNn+mUjrJPtPbTq6bX9YhsPCVgwDsRqPmOcrYl44RpyZojG0HG+Mb+RKNPyTCjTSkRchE/WnM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1705449766; c=relaxed/simple; bh=aePeyFduRfjV06agsTSgcBO9WyTyujZeq0WIAUBMi3I=; h=DKIM-Signature:X-IronPort-AV:X-IronPort-AV:Received:X-ExtLoop1: X-IronPort-AV:X-IronPort-AV:Received:Received:Date:From:To:Cc: Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=gMbArkSD439wBdDIKfvPJnaOpK8UpnRiBWacnWjj6ezUTKbZ4W4IiMLFAUTPzZb/sJFOwb0ZPC3HLJpowySCSBIK0al3Ca7iGxJ3WIYM2d/8B+yh75/eiijOicBGw0BiXzm/zAFRF2pif5WS6/1EP1jrKm3Re1S/eloo4MK5IWA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=CL0HZHXA; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.11 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="CL0HZHXA" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1705449765; x=1736985765; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=aePeyFduRfjV06agsTSgcBO9WyTyujZeq0WIAUBMi3I=; b=CL0HZHXA1eABc1acOnM6dthnsy2TGcXkgHf3C/EsfLk5IeuhsPy/tQjq FcrHydWEe56TsJjBK89Sch122WOlgUTUYA1MX6cSaf51YrzezUrkHbTpp AgQc3KSzTuqezLlfCfxz5Vipn75KthsWJKsovFhvEpgFsAbKkDSqWFnkJ TZ3gRBtw/bXt2vAqTNCX26Ib/6k5dFsS847ObfJSydEAAl6D5ZtaxbWsd Fo5HVhQCWH6fSYFZuSi3YYVGez0s43GskYpQA73ktq795/b0qBKsEDn7/ uYHAwsKUMgL+3DMRfuvrTsvbu5IslAYeRV4rDIH0IH+8sQxglkEAsFiJy g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10955"; a="6732069" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.05,200,1701158400"; d="scan'208";a="6732069" Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orvoesa103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Jan 2024 16:02:40 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10955"; a="818331734" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.05,200,1701158400"; d="scan'208";a="818331734" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 961aaaa5b03c) ([10.239.97.150]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Jan 2024 16:02:36 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 961aaaa5b03c with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1rPtO5-0001Ne-2l; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 00:02:33 +0000 Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 08:02:11 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Michael Grzeschik , Eric Van Hensbergen , Latchesar Ionkov , Dominique Martinet , Christian Schoenebeck , Jonathan Corbet , Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, v9fs@lists.linux.dev, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de, Michael Grzeschik Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] usb: gadget: function: 9pfs Message-ID: <202401170734.7rHBG2LF-lkp@intel.com> References: <20240116-ml-topic-u9p-v1-1-ad8c306f9a4e@pengutronix.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240116-ml-topic-u9p-v1-1-ad8c306f9a4e@pengutronix.de> Hi Michael, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on 052d534373b7ed33712a63d5e17b2b6cdbce84fd] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Michael-Grzeschik/usb-gadget-function-9pfs/20240116-095914 base: 052d534373b7ed33712a63d5e17b2b6cdbce84fd patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240116-ml-topic-u9p-v1-1-ad8c306f9a4e%40pengutronix.de patch subject: [PATCH 1/3] usb: gadget: function: 9pfs config: microblaze-randconfig-r132-20240117 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240117/202401170734.7rHBG2LF-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: microblaze-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240117/202401170734.7rHBG2LF-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202401170734.7rHBG2LF-lkp@intel.com/ sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) >> drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_9pfs.c:825:12: sparse: sparse: symbol 'usb9pfs_modinit' was not declared. Should it be static? >> drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_9pfs.c:838:13: sparse: sparse: symbol 'usb9pfs_modexit' was not declared. Should it be static? vim +/usb9pfs_modinit +825 drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_9pfs.c 824 > 825 int __init usb9pfs_modinit(void) 826 { 827 int ret; 828 829 INIT_LIST_HEAD(&usbg_function_list); 830 831 ret = usb_function_register(&usb9pfsusb_func); 832 if (!ret) 833 v9fs_register_trans(&p9_usbg_trans); 834 835 return ret; 836 } 837 > 838 void __exit usb9pfs_modexit(void) 839 { 840 usb_function_unregister(&usb9pfsusb_func); 841 v9fs_unregister_trans(&p9_usbg_trans); 842 } 843 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki