From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 540ED17C8B for ; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 01:31:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.12 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711589513; cv=none; b=rlKc95ePrYKsuRgygkikDnsGdLzWT1mrdK1zYpXrv2U4nn9uy884Sv0ol0UaSJkTNSspF3KTO2mWeL8aep8qRgYyYbTUZxv6hRFqVR9d7LlREOGd20p9wgXR3rymAoNSW5VNo1d1k+z0j6A41wBEEx0kcw96HsBJZj7S9aDTdGA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711589513; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ldZ7FHyLIiyTh7OMYtqC0ADh9QERRbTQgkL8bAWBlbU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Vevdq/qwMSQRO6Xsg2Sm6IMrD+mdvWYUZW5+Y0qV2T8GCOxSFxniehLnweikOq+SM3ffRGACMLmiQrCz+3zeXrunNeeo0qnOMsGw+YBb3V+TIiZ4osedNRd0CT/voq8llaNuzv7L2MlyUaYEx0dKow+gMKg0LC6pT4v9GvpxZ50= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=n1iYHakG; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.12 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="n1iYHakG" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1711589510; x=1743125510; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=ldZ7FHyLIiyTh7OMYtqC0ADh9QERRbTQgkL8bAWBlbU=; b=n1iYHakGFpFvTWVjH8NXCe8TDC4pzc4Vh2YPyIv5TYuZMqdZnqd1brsF utLhA4B/gNYR1N5i1wPnyRNaSMvAB4V9765aOMFMuYCKN6ty8Sr8pphrF QGAtkKv6I89k23MBvEnx54/bqV5StWBE4ujjYsisuY3Bspxhz0WeP+dCc GHLWLroz3Omj5vIEMtOf68uL48ZZWj5sP3xwGPG2jXjBuXRlDHu+I6ZpM LtzRedLJllfPc1/hlWoTYdfrKUbciRHUJCaBg1uaDl2Zg61Gy5LSQKwG+ R7JZ1MvF4g0sLs5NkvWmbfpMPF6J5Sbx6oKHPy0jbSuz+/c25YbYn5bcm A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: Xf9CYR8wS+Sm2mZG3aCbDA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: xLLfOh+VSFS5zaCNO3lXJw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11026"; a="10506075" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,160,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="10506075" Received: from fmviesa004.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.144]) by fmvoesa106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Mar 2024 18:31:50 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,160,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="21146002" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO be39aa325d23) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 Mar 2024 18:31:47 -0700 Received: from kbuild by be39aa325d23 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1rpecL-0001fz-06; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 01:31:45 +0000 Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 09:31:14 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Gowthami Thiagarajan , will@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, sgoutham@marvell.com, bbhushan2@marvell.com, gcherian@marvell.com, Gowthami Thiagarajan Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v4 2/3] perf/marvell: perf/marvell: Odyssey DDR Performance Message-ID: <202403280921.NALZ6Tp8-lkp@intel.com> References: <20240327071832.1556576-3-gthiagarajan@marvell.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240327071832.1556576-3-gthiagarajan@marvell.com> Hi Gowthami, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on soc/for-next] [also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.9-rc1 next-20240327] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Gowthami-Thiagarajan/perf-marvell-Refactor-to-extract-platform-data/20240327-152242 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/soc/soc.git for-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240327071832.1556576-3-gthiagarajan%40marvell.com patch subject: [RESEND PATCH v4 2/3] perf/marvell: perf/marvell: Odyssey DDR Performance config: sparc-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240328/202403280921.NALZ6Tp8-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: sparc64-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240328/202403280921.NALZ6Tp8-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202403280921.NALZ6Tp8-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> drivers/perf/marvell_cn10k_ddr_pmu.c:982:34: warning: 'ddr_pmu_v2_data' defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=] 982 | static const struct ddr_pmu_data ddr_pmu_v2_data = { | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +/ddr_pmu_v2_data +982 drivers/perf/marvell_cn10k_ddr_pmu.c 981 > 982 static const struct ddr_pmu_data ddr_pmu_v2_data = { 983 .id = DDR_PMU_V2, 984 }; 985 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki