On Thu 25-08-22 00:05:05, Shakeel Butt wrote: > With memcg v2 enabled, memcg->memory.usage is a very hot member for > the workloads doing memcg charging on multiple CPUs concurrently. > Particularly the network intensive workloads. In addition, there is a > false cache sharing between memory.usage and memory.high on the charge > path. This patch moves the usage into a separate cacheline and move all > the read most fields into separate cacheline. > > To evaluate the impact of this optimization, on a 72 CPUs machine, we > ran the following workload in a three level of cgroup hierarchy. > > $ netserver -6 > # 36 instances of netperf with following params > $ netperf -6 -H ::1 -l 60 -t TCP_SENDFILE -- -m 10K > > Results (average throughput of netperf): > Without (6.0-rc1) 10482.7 Mbps > With patch 12413.7 Mbps (18.4% improvement) > > With the patch, the throughput improved by 18.4%. > > One side-effect of this patch is the increase in the size of struct > mem_cgroup. For example with this patch on 64 bit build, the size of > struct mem_cgroup increased from 4032 bytes to 4416 bytes. However for > the performance improvement, this additional size is worth it. In > addition there are opportunities to reduce the size of struct > mem_cgroup like deprecation of kmem and tcpmem page counters and > better packing. > > Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt > Reported-by: kernel test robot > Reviewed-by: Feng Tang > Acked-by: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh > Acked-by: Roman Gushchin Acked-by: Michal Hocko One nit below > --- > Changes since v1: > - Updated the commit message > - Make struct page_counter cache align. > > include/linux/page_counter.h | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------ > 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/page_counter.h b/include/linux/page_counter.h > index 679591301994..78a1c934e416 100644 > --- a/include/linux/page_counter.h > +++ b/include/linux/page_counter.h > @@ -3,15 +3,26 @@ > #define _LINUX_PAGE_COUNTER_H > > #include > +#include > #include > #include > > +#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) > +struct pc_padding { > + char x[0]; > +} ____cacheline_internodealigned_in_smp; > +#define PC_PADDING(name) struct pc_padding name > +#else > +#define PC_PADDING(name) > +#endif > + > struct page_counter { > + /* > + * Make sure 'usage' does not share cacheline with any other field. The > + * memcg->memory.usage is a hot member of struct mem_cgroup. > + */ > atomic_long_t usage; > - unsigned long min; > - unsigned long low; > - unsigned long high; > - unsigned long max; > + PC_PADDING(_pad1_); > > /* effective memory.min and memory.min usage tracking */ > unsigned long emin; > @@ -23,18 +34,18 @@ struct page_counter { > atomic_long_t low_usage; > atomic_long_t children_low_usage; > > - /* legacy */ > unsigned long watermark; > unsigned long failcnt; These two are also touched in the charging path so we could squeeze them into the same cache line as usage. 0-day machinery was quite good at hitting noticeable regression anytime we have changed layout so let's see what they come up with after this patch ;) -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs