From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=sOQg=O7=lists.ozlabs.org=openbmc-bounces+openbmc=archiver.kernel.org@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DB1AC433FE
	for <openbmc@archiver.kernel.org>; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 13:59:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA81661207
	for <openbmc@archiver.kernel.org>; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 13:59:25 +0000 (UTC)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org AA81661207
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org
Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1])
	by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4HSgQN0mJDz2yWr
	for <openbmc@archiver.kernel.org>; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 00:59:24 +1100 (AEDT)
Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org;
	dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 header.b=faORq9Uk;
	dkim-atps=neutral
Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized)
 smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::829;
 helo=mail-qt1-x829.google.com; envelope-from=frowand.list@gmail.com;
 receiver=<UNKNOWN>)
Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key;
 unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256
 header.s=20210112 header.b=faORq9Uk; dkim-atps=neutral
Received: from mail-qt1-x829.google.com (mail-qt1-x829.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::829])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HSgPW35Vwz2xsy
 for <openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org>; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 00:58:37 +1100 (AEDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x829.google.com with SMTP id r1so16421947qta.12
 for <openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org>; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 06:58:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
 h=subject:from:to:cc:references:message-id:date:user-agent
 :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=kqrxxGCbuV1+Wb54X2S9cpbSCgL2RLWSvelFSnVKInA=;
 b=faORq9Uk/3SyX2hlObvqIDLLC9yibUJ////9EJLmx1I2hoa5xmtfqXHgWjWjnkATym
 5dd0OwI8rQ7asznjmDC+cs23/JyvmbF/9KCo4SryVVM4ZV6BvelduJL9qu+lZHeNfFOD
 yG6RYF7X+zSEaBtSmz1XEKPwoVkttXiIPihX5H4UdY7g2YmgCeE6R0mywFWIljhkb5ot
 WPz5z/peWojuy2Pe2Pj4mZQgYnE4vYpgZbP5AAHfZNbHNKN9cZV5lD5U47pE20DLNzPt
 O4ZTtKQmtRJys6uU3rrBG1DMXi2dUchxi0nawJmYwrUK6vscjGty3vJ9Rfxs/qnlc6SK
 UC4Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
 h=x-gm-message-state:subject:from:to:cc:references:message-id:date
 :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language
 :content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=kqrxxGCbuV1+Wb54X2S9cpbSCgL2RLWSvelFSnVKInA=;
 b=blrJjXvKrV0TTRKUOSQb3+XFo6SWSHxcfdXrmd8KUdy7jyGjy2XKBrsAxDeD/LPLdL
 gLqGztjHeM8CfFAIZHqchVNCmUdAbtKdfruJKT/HDFTnpQJB5tAZNFym+VRKW0FqVDNY
 qyslTI3eyGXTxpJ37UGtwfq3iET9jZXzasjqduS1qcN07qiu3yVncp5hP1ZI55vhaPPw
 AeiPVYjnjipD1CkPv8RmK1X3lEHDxKuaRSjrHvaQ/kZM2IIMha6qRkUeL/phF2rzsNH/
 gRXfnk5M23rIOxaznAuTI6WuBWO3AJ1XPa0q/O2ynBE1s1Qnzlam5oHEpRRcGqipLKN1
 zI/w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531hVz5VgCYa8KAStwoamq53+j714tYQ7rPxjHgs/kg7AjeIK6im
 /O/p+pt4ltGWiTyV+F8TvaE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy8eU96X6cybbCi+HK8BrLg44dixtV4huqfV0oNdJTb5amfv1e8vOpH4rgFrXrFILKgKrGnGg==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:1341:: with SMTP id
 w1mr15254404qtk.127.1633960713719; 
 Mon, 11 Oct 2021 06:58:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2600:2b00:7f04:c300:b01e:1134:3ab1:111a?
 ([2600:2b00:7f04:c300:b01e:1134:3ab1:111a])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j15sm4718788qth.3.2021.10.11.06.58.32
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Mon, 11 Oct 2021 06:58:33 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] of: add support for 'dynamic' DT property
From: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
To: Zev Weiss <zev@bewilderbeest.net>, openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org
References: <20211007000954.30621-1-zev@bewilderbeest.net>
 <20211007000954.30621-7-zev@bewilderbeest.net>
 <7bf5cfce-e84d-f0e8-e6e8-8e6fedffd154@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <05e4c31e-db7e-e8f2-fa37-3cdcdf902e19@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 08:58:32 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.13.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <7bf5cfce-e84d-f0e8-e6e8-8e6fedffd154@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC <openbmc.lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/options/openbmc>,
 <mailto:openbmc-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/openbmc/>
List-Post: <mailto:openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openbmc-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/openbmc>,
 <mailto:openbmc-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
 Jeremy Kerr <jk@codeconstruct.com.au>
Errors-To: openbmc-bounces+openbmc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org
Sender: "openbmc"
 <openbmc-bounces+openbmc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org>

Hi Matt, Greg,

On 10/8/21 1:51 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 10/6/21 7:09 PM, Zev Weiss wrote:
>> Nodes marked with this (boolean) property will have a writable status
>> sysfs file, which can be used to toggle them between "okay" and
>> "reserved", effectively hot-plugging them.  Note that this will only
>> be effective for devices on busses that register for OF reconfig
>> notifications (currently spi, i2c, and platform), and only if
>> CONFIG_OF_DYNAMIC is enabled.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zev Weiss <zev@bewilderbeest.net>
>> ---
>>  drivers/of/kobj.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 69 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/of/kobj.c b/drivers/of/kobj.c
>> index 378cb421aae1..141ae23f3130 100644
>> --- a/drivers/of/kobj.c
>> +++ b/drivers/of/kobj.c
>> @@ -36,6 +36,69 @@ static ssize_t of_node_property_read(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
>>      return memory_read_from_buffer(buf, count, &offset, pp->value, pp->length);
>>  }
>>  
>> +static ssize_t of_node_status_write(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
>> +                                    struct bin_attribute *bin_attr, char *buf,
>> +                                    loff_t offset, size_t count)
>> +{
>> +    int rc;
>> +    char *newstatus;
>> +    struct property **deadprev;
>> +    struct property *newprop = NULL;
>> +    struct property *oldprop = container_of(bin_attr, struct property, attr);
>> +    struct device_node *np = container_of(kobj, struct device_node, kobj);
>> +
>> +    if (WARN_ON_ONCE(strcmp(oldprop->name, "status")))
>> +            return -EIO;
>> +
>> +    if (offset)
>> +            return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +    if (sysfs_buf_streq(buf, count, "okay") || sysfs_buf_streq(buf, count, "ok"))
>> +            newstatus = "okay";
>> +    else if (sysfs_buf_streq(buf, count, "reserved"))
>> +            newstatus = "reserved";
>> +    else if (sysfs_buf_streq(buf, count, "disabled"))
>> +            newstatus = "disabled";
>> +    else
>> +            return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +    if (!strcmp(newstatus, oldprop->value))
>> +            return count;
>> +
> 
> If the general approach of this patch set is the correct way to provide the desired
> functionality (I'm still pondering that), then a version of the following code

After pondering, this approach does not appear workable to me.

If we allow one property to be writable via sysfs we open the door for any property to
be writable from sysfs.  This will likely lead to a desire to modify more than one
related property as a single transaction (so that the changes occur as a single
transaction, under a single lock event, with a single notification after all
of the properties are modified).  This is not meant to be an exhaustive list of
the issues that have already been thought through in the context of overlays
(though not all of the issues have been addressed with overlays, at least many
of them, such as one transaction to apply an entire overlay, have been.)

I don't want to make this a long missive, but will at least note the next
issue that popped up in my pondering, which is complications from modifying
the same items in a devicetree via different methods, such as both writing
to sysfs and applying/removing overlays.  If the problems in the previous
paragraph are not sufficient to prevent the sysfs approach then I can
elaborate further on these additional issues.

So another approach is needed.  I have no yet thought this through, but I
have an alternative.  First, change the new property name from "dynamic"
to something more descriptive like "ownership_shifts_between_os_and_others"
(yes, my suggestions is way too verbose and needs to be word smithed, but
the point is to clearly state the underlying action that occurs), then
define the result of this variable to be driver specific, where the
driver is required upon probe to instantiate the device in a manner
that does not impact the other user(s) of the underlying hardware
and to use a driver specific method to transfer control of the
hardware between the os and the other user(s).  I propose the method
would be via a device specific file (or set of files) in sysfs (Greg's
input invited on the use of sysfs in this manner - if I recall correctly
this is the current preferred mechanism).

-Frank


> probably belongs in drivers/of/dynamic.c so that it is easier to maintain and keep
> consistent with other dynamic devicetree updates.  If you look at the code there
> that touches deadprops (eg __of_changeset_entry_apply()) you will notice that the
> locking issues are more extensive than what is implemented here.
> 
> I'm still thinking about how this interacts with other forms of dynamic devicetree
> changes (eg drivers/of/dynamic.c and also overlays).
> 
>> +    /*
>> +     * of_update_property_self() doesn't free replaced properties, so
>> +     * rifle through deadprops first to see if there's an equivalent old
>> +     * status property we can reuse instead of allocating a new one.
>> +     */
>> +    mutex_lock(&of_mutex);
>> +    for (deadprev = &np->deadprops; *deadprev; deadprev = &(*deadprev)->next) {
>> +            struct property *deadprop = *deadprev;
>> +            if (!strcmp(deadprop->name, "status") &&
>> +                deadprop->length == strlen(newstatus) + 1 &&
>> +                !strcmp(deadprop->value, newstatus)) {
>> +                    *deadprev = deadprop->next;
>> +                    deadprop->next = NULL;
>> +                    newprop = deadprop;
>> +                    break;
>> +            }
>> +    }
>> +    mutex_unlock(&of_mutex);
>> +
>> +    if (!newprop) {
>> +            newprop = kzalloc(sizeof(*newprop), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +            if (!newprop)
>> +                    return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +            newprop->name = oldprop->name;
>> +            newprop->value = newstatus;
>> +            newprop->length = strlen(newstatus) + 1;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    rc = of_update_property_self(np, newprop, true);
> 
> -Frank
> 
>> +
>> +    return rc ? rc : count;
>> +}
>> +
>>  /* always return newly allocated name, caller must free after use */
>>  static const char *safe_name(struct kobject *kobj, const char *orig_name)
>>  {
>> @@ -79,6 +142,12 @@ int __of_add_property_sysfs(struct device_node *np, struct property *pp)
>>      pp->attr.size = secure ? 0 : pp->length;
>>      pp->attr.read = of_node_property_read;
>>  
>> +    if (!strcmp(pp->name, "status") && of_property_read_bool(np, "dynamic")) {
>> +            pp->attr.attr.mode |= 0200;
>> +            pp->attr.write = of_node_status_write;
>> +            pp->attr.growable = true;
>> +    }
>> +
>>      rc = sysfs_create_bin_file(&np->kobj, &pp->attr);
>>      WARN(rc, "error adding attribute %s to node %pOF\n", pp->name, np);
>>      return rc;
>>