From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 584B6C2B9F7 for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 00:57:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D60DE6135F for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 00:57:38 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D60DE6135F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=aj.id.au Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=openbmc-bounces+openbmc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FpwfT3j3Lz304R for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 10:57:37 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=aj.id.au header.i=@aj.id.au header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm2 header.b=O5h4eUlc; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm2 header.b=RS/GobZI; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=aj.id.au (client-ip=66.111.4.224; helo=new2-smtp.messagingengine.com; envelope-from=andrew@aj.id.au; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=aj.id.au header.i=@aj.id.au header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm2 header.b=O5h4eUlc; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm2 header.b=RS/GobZI; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from new2-smtp.messagingengine.com (new2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.224]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fpwdz6J2gz2xtk; Tue, 25 May 2021 10:57:11 +1000 (AEST) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailnew.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACB26580B3A; Mon, 24 May 2021 20:57:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from imap2 ([10.202.2.52]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 24 May 2021 20:57:09 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=aj.id.au; h= mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to:cc :subject:content-type; s=fm2; bh=DRCx3gvpKzrkcfOBIF31kbut6buaISo YXBZyw7SWnec=; b=O5h4eUlcu2PzsIy06z94jNoRp8DAfhih7cRj88w+XlUXn1W 5cHLVic9/NmOVhEn/RRUKaGnAJlmjeEiY4T/nOf6Df8OrjKoEtv1wbp/xgtD8PYf mfLPS1rixsQsdfaF7xHS3CmmWHQpDAFFfetmMPje+I0RebDq3eg1+SxVLFQ7CSkh kIEMkOu7BROCDjoVpiG52HOZv0cfh0i8lQvSvpqxFsynofXRGg5f8bUt/mslYPyd frB7dPU0OWJTgXMHU0bmsXREwMo9b2QrKe5akWquZuy0X9EaRwXY9tKutO3kha85 Fy2nJ82fd1szGi/WLe23+zFznob7OC7e/IzrVcA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=DRCx3g vpKzrkcfOBIF31kbut6buaISoYXBZyw7SWnec=; b=RS/GobZIdEiJLkJE6U6JQn 056Wzn4jq7L62zM0M44faUuETwuhXmHInzmhzyc5WKVq8uI52qsUhwVgHjgflzKI 2mQqCSwWcvtuFD5VcFhYeQRVPYi311VrcTCU0N41Cb/Cd9O5lg55iQOOeUXkBKuE K9fxF1bZPSSmSGIikY2T+QfEH1UBbFYpoAddoQTqof8RVJh7dTfI8WXpfilX6BCR YcOLFd73nldSZ6N213fmG5wKkdHYX51R9N/datuOxFzuWPKFNI2fjES/0mQvCpcY cS42fS3HrsBHf4V9tKccRYd284Jae2JoKE6h6yhJRZBz+NOHoeiQAtk4Vy2hfqJw == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrvdektddgfeekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesthdtredtreerjeenucfhrhhomhepfdetnhgu rhgvficulfgvfhhfvghrhidfuceorghnughrvgifsegrjhdrihgurdgruheqnecuggftrf grthhtvghrnhepuddttdekueeggedvtddtueekiedutdfguedutdefieeuteefieelteet vddthfeinecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgepudenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomh eprghnughrvgifsegrjhdrihgurdgruh X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 76C91A00079; Mon, 24 May 2021 20:57:08 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.5.0-alpha0-448-gae190416c7-fm-20210505.004-gae190416 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <17519567-2623-4a47-8e4a-be8f630d5013@www.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20210524111338.16049-2-steven_lee@aspeedtech.com> References: <20210524111338.16049-1-steven_lee@aspeedtech.com> <20210524111338.16049-2-steven_lee@aspeedtech.com> Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 10:26:47 +0930 From: "Andrew Jeffery" To: "Steven Lee" , "Linus Walleij" , "Rob Herring" , "Joel Stanley" , "moderated list:ASPEED PINCTRL DRIVERS" , "moderated list:ASPEED PINCTRL DRIVERS" , "open list:ASPEED PINCTRL DRIVERS" , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , "moderated list:ARM/ASPEED MACHINE SUPPORT" , "open list" Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re:_[PATCH_v1_1/3]_dt-bindings:_pinctrl:_Update_enum_for_addin?= =?UTF-8?Q?g_SGPM2_and_SGPS2?= Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Billy Tsai , Ryan Chen , Hongwei Zhang Errors-To: openbmc-bounces+openbmc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "openbmc" On Mon, 24 May 2021, at 20:43, Steven Lee wrote: > AST2600 has 2 SGPIO master interfaces one with 128 pins and another one > has 80 pins. It also supports 2 SGPIO slave interfaces. > In the current bindings, there are only SGPM1 and SGPS1 defined in enum, > SGPM2 and SGPS2 should also be added in the bindings. > > Signed-off-by: Steven Lee Reviewed-by: Andrew Jeffery