From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EAB1C433FE for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2021 21:50:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D21F613D2 for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2021 21:50:36 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 4D21F613D2 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sandelman.ca Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4HNZCG4z8Bz2yxm for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 08:50:34 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=sandelman.ca (client-ip=209.87.249.19; helo=tuna.sandelman.ca; envelope-from=mcr@sandelman.ca; receiver=) X-Greylist: delayed 114 seconds by postgrey-1.36 at boromir; Tue, 05 Oct 2021 08:50:05 AEDT Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HNZBj6c6Lz2yNq for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 08:50:05 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB049182BF; Mon, 4 Oct 2021 17:58:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Xvs1UQ8B2vmG; Mon, 4 Oct 2021 17:58:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AE92180C7; Mon, 4 Oct 2021 17:58:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7DD758B; Mon, 4 Oct 2021 17:49:58 -0400 (EDT) From: Michael Richardson To: Joseph Reynolds Subject: Re: Security Working Group meeting - Wednesday September 29 In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1 X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: openbmc Errors-To: openbmc-bounces+openbmc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "openbmc" --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Joseph Reynolds wrote: > Can we use consider SRP (dropped in OpenSSL 3.0 -- why?) or other > implementations such as GnuTLS? I meant to add/ask: I assume OpenSSL is part of the build process today. Would switching to GnuTLS, WolfTLS or MbedTLS really be possible? -- ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | IoT architect [ ] mcr@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEbsyLEzg/qUTA43uogItw+93Q3WUFAmFbdwYACgkQgItw+93Q 3WVUqggAiYuMJNrsVFJ5XTaizKWfOmNzrgu7uO+F83eCha7uJ3Mc8SZ33smb12G2 I651hZFU3J7dBcHALNEF5l0xPlTKhWFBvU+OtR1SNtx1UJkSey5ng7o0zVJvrKDQ 50IwaVfdRzafsOR6eiNj/hCoPeZjl0l64XLMr9nw7ji48ra1V4bZGcggIMv8S9GG XeuA2XO6iAe0Lyp/LMoGrVWjZddQ5iZwMDC/N1zeJTJaSR/pCdnR5GA5IxlhOwwS YbHsV2oHDVn9yZhzK1saOutLFp9jZlQM1YJY/88OlGSQtDy/X1Hi1dF320r3ke8Z 0ih8g1Z7NGs7Y/FpN9IvPS/Jwgu/1w== =oOTW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--