From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD9FAC433DB for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 13:58:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3084F65141 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 13:58:19 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3084F65141 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=fuzziesquirrel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=openbmc-bounces+openbmc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Dvxcn3j17z3cJw for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 00:58:17 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=fuzziesquirrel.com header.i=@fuzziesquirrel.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm1 header.b=LYek1z1m; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm2 header.b=e4sjEUvf; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=fuzziesquirrel.com (client-ip=64.147.123.19; helo=wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com; envelope-from=bradleyb@fuzziesquirrel.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=fuzziesquirrel.com header.i=@fuzziesquirrel.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm1 header.b=LYek1z1m; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm2 header.b=e4sjEUvf; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DvxcK3JQrz2yjD for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 00:57:52 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CB19207B; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 08:57:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 09 Mar 2021 08:57:49 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= fuzziesquirrel.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm1; bh=TfB 7/kLTfPtHYEGK7QRBgTOdL8EB+HEIlJ7FvQg6ws8=; b=LYek1z1mwqcj3LyyZVU xTak9ujvsS3aQRJc1vQYSZ+jiNqA7gpkAfQfA2ThuWZQzjjPLZCpGpmOMXyFE8X5 ByRfu5zGQVJ8OxAWx/jAqxT25ZV8r7xCxWpgFseQwtzZZS4b9Z+SfgEl7lbCvwWS E/jJYxMhfsimAf7bz1re/Yfq5TRmr65Jk/iqq/0PhIZ/VIYvI7zNWqlfWZMsuZ5h t1fwsqAhN/WVSl/O3ZYa7fybBcNDpNYBLo76N8RwgAv010yI3Eoj4Qo0hyy3DKCt VYdLhwUxKpY194iVTLCbW5HYEq2C0EfrUTKCe/cj04oPlnjYza3f/U6nw+MbBHiR 7HQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=TfB7/k LTfPtHYEGK7QRBgTOdL8EB+HEIlJ7FvQg6ws8=; b=e4sjEUvf/A7ThT4jgfupXr rF0aGRE/KxjlaXp+KEjGTRDU7/2l9r5lMC8BnZgI7zJG4K7askwdkSEYoUQTW9Xz KTFQoFTjk0A8whxp+UxzV00N+GUWZE3Ok9Kv8psDntL6bm6KvTVvhWV9ESGfq3HY CmvUhuIvw9ZLc+Geu5x0w1KUufQPzbO5sibR2toVbg7WjNOGFTXiQ+jF1fxDbdfp 2E1YacYuRyiQ35AKHdfKALDI9ORNUG1nDahAnCz5dbSrysOq74VIJcj+PfLUvpia QlzfMJ5HSPUjFIEaslxNrXYZlM6/5q5UCjsxBvWjeoGkjZ20+KjbN399icXYJgjw == X-ME-Sender:

X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrudduiedgheelucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne gfrhhlucfvnfffucdlvdefmdenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesthdtredttddt vdenucfhrhhomhepuehrrgguuceuihhshhhophcuoegsrhgrughlvgihsgesfhhuiiiiih gvshhquhhirhhrvghlrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeekkeeliedthfdvtdeg ueehvddvkeeivddujefhhfevhfdujeeugeefffeltdejtdenucffohhmrghinhepohhpvg hnsghmtgdqphhrohhjvggtthdrgiihiienucfkphepudejfedrudeijedrfedurdduleej necuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepsghrrg gulhgvhigssehfuhiiiihivghsqhhuihhrrhgvlhdrtghomh X-ME-Proxy:

Received: from thinkpad.fuzziesquirrel.com (unknown [173.167.31.197]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 1E0611080059; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 08:57:48 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 08:57:45 -0500 From: Brad Bishop To: Ed Tanous Subject: Re: Making the "new repo" requests go faster Message-ID: <20210309135745.vgx3mjwnfnkvilxx@thinkpad.fuzziesquirrel.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: OpenBMC Maillist Errors-To: openbmc-bounces+openbmc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "openbmc" On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 11:02:24AM -0800, Ed Tanous wrote: >On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 12:02 PM Ed Tanous wrote: >> >> In an effort to fix these issues and more, I'd like to propose >> creating a new repository for a "new daemon" template. > >If anyone is following this thread still, patches have been pushed to >https://gerrit.openbmc-project.xyz/c/openbmc/docs/+/41099 for the >moment. As they get closer to approval, I'd like to get a new >template repo created to house the code contained in that patch, and >CI setup on said repo if I could. Thanks Ed! The only reason I haven't created this already was I wasn't sure what to call it. Any ideas on a name out there? -brad