From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BFA9C2B9F7 for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 03:03:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86E1360231 for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 03:03:55 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 86E1360231 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=aspeedtech.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=openbmc-bounces+openbmc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FpzSB1c2Sz301C for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 13:03:54 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=fail (SPF fail - not authorized) smtp.mailfrom=aspeedtech.com (client-ip=211.20.114.71; helo=twspam01.aspeedtech.com; envelope-from=steven_lee@aspeedtech.com; receiver=) Received: from twspam01.aspeedtech.com (twspam01.aspeedtech.com [211.20.114.71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FpzRn6F9Nz2ymQ; Tue, 25 May 2021 13:03:31 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail.aspeedtech.com ([192.168.0.24]) by twspam01.aspeedtech.com with ESMTP id 14P2o1K3012766; Tue, 25 May 2021 10:50:01 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from steven_lee@aspeedtech.com) Received: from aspeedtech.com (192.168.100.253) by TWMBX02.aspeed.com (192.168.0.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Tue, 25 May 2021 11:02:58 +0800 Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 11:02:55 +0800 From: Steven Lee To: Andrew Jeffery Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] pinctrl: pinctrl-aspeed-g6: Add sgpio pinctrl settings Message-ID: <20210525030254.GA23525@aspeedtech.com> References: <20210524111338.16049-1-steven_lee@aspeedtech.com> <20210524111338.16049-4-steven_lee@aspeedtech.com> <43b00f2e-4381-4899-b561-da9a24347f8b@www.fastmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43b00f2e-4381-4899-b561-da9a24347f8b@www.fastmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-Originating-IP: [192.168.100.253] X-ClientProxiedBy: TWMBX02.aspeed.com (192.168.0.24) To TWMBX02.aspeed.com (192.168.0.24) X-DNSRBL: X-MAIL: twspam01.aspeedtech.com 14P2o1K3012766 X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , Ryan Chen , "moderated list:ASPEED PINCTRL DRIVERS" , Linus Walleij , open list , Hongwei Zhang , Billy Tsai , "open list:ASPEED PINCTRL DRIVERS" , Rob Herring , "moderated list:ASPEED PINCTRL DRIVERS" , "moderated list:ARM/ASPEED MACHINE SUPPORT" Errors-To: openbmc-bounces+openbmc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "openbmc" The 05/25/2021 08:54, Andrew Jeffery wrote: > Hi Steven, > > On Mon, 24 May 2021, at 20:43, Steven Lee wrote: > > AST2600 supports 2 SGPIO master interfaces and 2 SGPIO slave interfaces. > > Current pinctrl driver only define the first sgpio master and slave > > interfaces. > > The sencond SGPIO master and slave interfaces should be added in > > pinctrl driver as well. > > > > Signed-off-by: Steven Lee > > --- > > drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed-g6.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++---- > > drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinmux-aspeed.h | 9 ++++++++ > > 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed-g6.c > > b/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed-g6.c > > index 5c1a109842a7..d0e9ab9d1a9c 100644 > > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed-g6.c > > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed-g6.c > > @@ -46,8 +46,10 @@ > > #define SCU620 0x620 /* Disable GPIO Internal Pull-Down #4 */ > > #define SCU634 0x634 /* Disable GPIO Internal Pull-Down #5 */ > > #define SCU638 0x638 /* Disable GPIO Internal Pull-Down #6 */ > > +#define SCU690 0x690 /* Multi-function Pin Control #24 */ > > #define SCU694 0x694 /* Multi-function Pin Control #25 */ > > #define SCU69C 0x69C /* Multi-function Pin Control #27 */ > > +#define SCU6D0 0x6D0 /* Multi-function Pin Control #29 */ > > #define SCUC20 0xC20 /* PCIE configuration Setting Control */ > > > > #define ASPEED_G6_NR_PINS 256 > > @@ -81,13 +83,17 @@ FUNC_GROUP_DECL(I2C12, L26, K24); > > #define K26 4 > > SIG_EXPR_LIST_DECL_SESG(K26, MACLINK1, MACLINK1, SIG_DESC_SET(SCU410, 4)); > > SIG_EXPR_LIST_DECL_SESG(K26, SCL13, I2C13, SIG_DESC_SET(SCU4B0, 4)); > > -PIN_DECL_2(K26, GPIOA4, MACLINK1, SCL13); > > +SIG_EXPR_LIST_DECL_SESG(K26, SGPS2CK, SGPS2, SIG_DESC_SET(SCU690, 4)); > > +SIG_EXPR_LIST_DECL_SESG(K26, SGPM2CLK, SGPM2, SIG_DESC_SET(SCU6D0, 4)); > > +PIN_DECL_4(K26, GPIOA4, SGPM2CLK, SGPS2CK, MACLINK1, SCL13); > > Is this the right priority order? Looking at the Multi-Function Pin > Mapping and Control table, function 1 is MACLINK1, > function 2 is SCL13, function 3 is SGPS2CK, and I assume function 4 > would be SGPM2CLK, except it's not documented in the table in v9 of the > datasheet (I hope it will be documented?). > > If function 1 is the highest priority (which is what all the Aspeed > pinctrl drivers assume), then this should be: > > PIN_DECL_4(K26, GPIOA4, MACLINK1, SCL13, SGPS2CK, SGPM2CLK); > > Anyway, one of several things could be at fault here: > > 1. I've made a wrong assumption about the priority order in how I've > implemented pinctrl support for Aspeed SoCs > > 2. The Multi-Function Pin Mapping and Control table is out of date and > needs to be fixed (which it already does as it doesn't list SGPM2CLK). > > 3. The patch needs to align with the assumptions of the Aspeed pinctrl > support. > > I don't think it's 1 as I haven't heard of any issues where we are > getting incorrect behaviour because of pinmux. I don't think it's 2 as > this patch makes a non-linear change to the ordering. So my hunch is > the issue is 3, that the patch is putting the signals in the wrong order. > In this case, you want the PIN_DECL_4(...) I outlined above. > Yes, you are right. Per discussion with the designer, the priority order is MACLINK1 > SCL13 > SGPS2CK > SGPM2CLK We will add the information in the v10 datasheet. > > FUNC_GROUP_DECL(MACLINK1, K26); > > > > #define L24 5 > > SIG_EXPR_LIST_DECL_SESG(L24, MACLINK2, MACLINK2, SIG_DESC_SET(SCU410, 5)); > > SIG_EXPR_LIST_DECL_SESG(L24, SDA13, I2C13, SIG_DESC_SET(SCU4B0, 5)); > > -PIN_DECL_2(L24, GPIOA5, MACLINK2, SDA13); > > +SIG_EXPR_LIST_DECL_SESG(L24, SGPS2LD, SGPS2, SIG_DESC_SET(SCU690, 5)); > > +SIG_EXPR_LIST_DECL_SESG(L24, SGPM2LD, SGPM2, SIG_DESC_SET(SCU6D0, 5)); > > +PIN_DECL_4(L24, GPIOA5, SGPM2LD, SGPS2LD, MACLINK2, SDA13); > > See above. > Will change the order. > > FUNC_GROUP_DECL(MACLINK2, L24); > > > > FUNC_GROUP_DECL(I2C13, K26, L24); > > @@ -95,16 +101,22 @@ FUNC_GROUP_DECL(I2C13, K26, L24); > > #define L23 6 > > SIG_EXPR_LIST_DECL_SESG(L23, MACLINK3, MACLINK3, SIG_DESC_SET(SCU410, 6)); > > SIG_EXPR_LIST_DECL_SESG(L23, SCL14, I2C14, SIG_DESC_SET(SCU4B0, 6)); > > -PIN_DECL_2(L23, GPIOA6, MACLINK3, SCL14); > > +SIG_EXPR_LIST_DECL_SESG(L23, SGPS2O, SGPS2, SIG_DESC_SET(SCU690, 6)); > > +SIG_EXPR_LIST_DECL_SESG(L23, SGPM2O, SGPM2, SIG_DESC_SET(SCU6D0, 6)); > > +PIN_DECL_4(L23, GPIOA6, SGPM2O, SGPS2O, MACLINK3, SCL14); > > See above. > Will change the order. > > FUNC_GROUP_DECL(MACLINK3, L23); > > > > #define K25 7 > > SIG_EXPR_LIST_DECL_SESG(K25, MACLINK4, MACLINK4, SIG_DESC_SET(SCU410, 7)); > > SIG_EXPR_LIST_DECL_SESG(K25, SDA14, I2C14, SIG_DESC_SET(SCU4B0, 7)); > > -PIN_DECL_2(K25, GPIOA7, MACLINK4, SDA14); > > +SIG_EXPR_LIST_DECL_SESG(K25, SGPS2I, SGPS2, SIG_DESC_SET(SCU690, 7)); > > +SIG_EXPR_LIST_DECL_SESG(K25, SGPM2I, SGPM2, SIG_DESC_SET(SCU6D0, 7)); > > +PIN_DECL_4(K25, GPIOA7, SGPM2I, SGPS2I, MACLINK4, SDA14); > > See above. > Will change the order. > > FUNC_GROUP_DECL(MACLINK4, K25); > > > > FUNC_GROUP_DECL(I2C14, L23, K25); > > +FUNC_GROUP_DECL(SGPM2, K26, L24, L23, K25); > > +FUNC_GROUP_DECL(SGPS2, K26, L24, L23, K25); > > > > #define J26 8 > > SIG_EXPR_LIST_DECL_SESG(J26, SALT1, SALT1, SIG_DESC_SET(SCU410, 8)); > > @@ -2060,7 +2072,9 @@ static const struct aspeed_pin_group > > aspeed_g6_groups[] = { > > ASPEED_PINCTRL_GROUP(EMMCG4), > > ASPEED_PINCTRL_GROUP(EMMCG8), > > ASPEED_PINCTRL_GROUP(SGPM1), > > + ASPEED_PINCTRL_GROUP(SGPM2), > > ASPEED_PINCTRL_GROUP(SGPS1), > > + ASPEED_PINCTRL_GROUP(SGPS2), > > ASPEED_PINCTRL_GROUP(SIOONCTRL), > > ASPEED_PINCTRL_GROUP(SIOPBI), > > ASPEED_PINCTRL_GROUP(SIOPBO), > > @@ -2276,7 +2290,9 @@ static const struct aspeed_pin_function > > aspeed_g6_functions[] = { > > ASPEED_PINCTRL_FUNC(SD1), > > ASPEED_PINCTRL_FUNC(SD2), > > ASPEED_PINCTRL_FUNC(SGPM1), > > + ASPEED_PINCTRL_FUNC(SGPM2), > > ASPEED_PINCTRL_FUNC(SGPS1), > > + ASPEED_PINCTRL_FUNC(SGPS2), > > ASPEED_PINCTRL_FUNC(SIOONCTRL), > > ASPEED_PINCTRL_FUNC(SIOPBI), > > ASPEED_PINCTRL_FUNC(SIOPBO), > > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinmux-aspeed.h > > b/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinmux-aspeed.h > > index dba5875ff276..125df796af36 100644 > > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinmux-aspeed.h > > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinmux-aspeed.h > > @@ -730,6 +730,15 @@ struct aspeed_pin_desc { > > SIG_EXPR_LIST_PTR(pin, low), \ > > SIG_EXPR_LIST_PTR(pin, other)) > > > > +#define PIN_DECL_4(pin, other, high, medium, low1, low2) \ > > Bit of a nit pick, but we might as well drop identifying the priorities > as high, medium and low given we now have low1 and low2. Maybe > something like this: > > #define PIN_DECL_4(pin, other, prio1, prio2, prio3, prio4) > Will modify the the macros. > Cheers, > > Andrew