From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77DC5C433F5 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2022 14:58:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Jzycv2Xdlz3cNZ for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 01:58:23 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=fuzziesquirrel.com header.i=@fuzziesquirrel.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm1 header.b=tORuF7e3; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm2 header.b=S4zqm7QB; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=fuzziesquirrel.com (client-ip=66.111.4.29; helo=out5-smtp.messagingengine.com; envelope-from=bradleyb@fuzziesquirrel.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=fuzziesquirrel.com header.i=@fuzziesquirrel.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm1 header.b=tORuF7e3; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm2 header.b=S4zqm7QB; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Jzyc62m1hz3bcn for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 01:57:41 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C29595C017C; Thu, 17 Feb 2022 09:57:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 17 Feb 2022 09:57:37 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= fuzziesquirrel.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm1; bh=TUjvHNV5+Gec7Ouno7Ey/A9489K0PpdLzGs6SZ YwmRQ=; b=tORuF7e31SR0hX6vIgPTrj6rmjdOSzVIf3PbtUUH5xvj0A6CyN13k0 iyad7xQV/WxSpg5g3+QjSZAmNaO4umJGuyaIIUoUpq755xzqu+vW0gUPJ5aL9jTx uxG+6HDSEke5UryTPTMOfuUTFQFp8mOK/cW4SprBCVAzx/BtGgdzRr8LCWDxocrE vpQmWp0LfqDJA+Q89fi84gJwZJC+65rigaBr8ga8Um/8Ze7fRa/gZ23kegGVJYl0 myfESs35Tv6MC9PBQejXISo741WXE9LNRmX4ZOln2bGznlgfrR/0SR5eHg49iath 3tAYsFlFQ9XUk3/BtjCfBUdJLnvAm4Bw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=TUjvHNV5+Gec7Ouno7Ey/A9489K0PpdLzGs6SZYwm RQ=; b=S4zqm7QBz9/RQBUEg44VWd6zrp5isAQtRaBVETy9nBza3dXOlaz7yLRAl BgZRr46UBkfu8cvBdrXIQ9MXz/qfDWL/M26VL/C6XL50kr2lotloG/yq+1z3AlfX pJhk614SJP/Jbg1D7SQ3b6h4726p+yCWr1IK0b2+Xt9lnhkLCJ1ukgbpLZd/x9Hh 5PDSpymljhfgu0ZfdgjBmlmt99+sppILQ84yac4olevBTYe+3hAaUtJgH5AhOmSf eQjs2TPvs9gUOctEtm1FLy3vOLQGMNclPqG/0xt5qwBOjZX/ZWSEjEmUc1FUEHWl 9vPVvulB+r+kNR+mUzxqSuO0RaxSg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvvddrjeekgdeilecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenfg hrlhcuvffnffculdefhedmnecujfgurheptggguffhjgffgffkfhfvofesthhqmhdthhdt vdenucfhrhhomhepuehrrgguuceuihhshhhophcuoegsrhgrughlvgihsgesfhhuiiiiih gvshhquhhirhhrvghlrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedttefhtdegudefteeg gfetueelgfffiedvheeifefhtdfgledvvdehkefgfeeufeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiii gvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegsrhgrughlvgihsgesfhhuiiiiihgv shhquhhirhhrvghlrdgtohhm X-ME-Proxy:

Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 17 Feb 2022 09:57:37 -0500 (EST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\)) Subject: Re: Upcoming OpenBMC release 2.11 From: Brad Bishop In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 09:57:36 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <4AF3D7E9-4752-4AF5-B556-BAD50F9560BD@fuzziesquirrel.com> References: To: Patrick Williams X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13) X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: OpenBMC List , Thaj Errors-To: openbmc-bounces+openbmc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "openbmc" > On Feb 11, 2022, at 3:56 PM, Patrick Williams = wrote: >=20 > On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 03:33:12PM +0530, Thaj wrote: >> Hi Patrick, >=20 > Hello Thaj, >=20 >>=20 >> 2.9 is quiet old. There are a lot of changes after that. A newer = u-boot >> with secure boot support, better AST2600 support etc. A new release = is >> necessary.=20 >=20 > It seems that not many people who are active contributors in the = community > actually care about releases, so there hasn't been much effort put = into it. > You used the word "necessary". Would you care to expand, for the = community, > what your use case is where you rely on releases? >=20 >> There is no 2.11.0-rc1 yet. Is it possible to initiate a release >> process? >=20 > The honister branch is effectively the '2.11.0-rc'. I don't have = permissions > to create tags myself. I'll see if Brad has bandwidth to create a tag = in the > near future. We have a 2.11.0 tag now.=