From: "Andrew Jeffery" <andrew@aj.id.au>
To: "Hongwei Zhang" <hongweiz@ami.com>,
"Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
"Bartosz Golaszewski" <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
"Joel Stanley" <joel@jms.id.au>,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH, v1 1/1] gpio: aspeed: Add gpio base address reading
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 10:57:13 +1030 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <775b31f0-c74c-4ebe-9588-bca3ee423383@www.fastmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210113223808.31626-2-hongweiz@ami.com>
Hello,
On Thu, 14 Jan 2021, at 09:08, Hongwei Zhang wrote:
> Add gpio base address reading in the driver; in old code, it just
> returns -1 to gpio->chip.base.
Why do you want to do this? It feels hacky. The base address only affects the
legacy sysfs number-space, and even then if you're using the sysfs interface
you can discover the base address for a specific gpiochip via the associated
attribute. For example:
# cat /sys/bus/platform/devices/1e780000.gpio/gpio/gpiochip*/base
816
I feel that you should instead be changing your userspace not to assume a fixed
value.
Finally, the base value is a linux-specific thing and doesn't belong in the
devicetree, and if it did, you would also need to update the devicetree binding
in Documentation/.
Cheers,
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-14 0:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-13 22:38 [PATCH, v1 0/1] gpio: aspeed: Add gpio base address reading Hongwei Zhang
2021-01-13 22:38 ` [PATCH, v1 1/1] " Hongwei Zhang
2021-01-14 0:27 ` Andrew Jeffery [this message]
2021-01-18 14:40 ` Linus Walleij
2021-02-05 16:34 ` Hongwei Zhang
2021-02-05 16:34 ` Hongwei Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=775b31f0-c74c-4ebe-9588-bca3ee423383@www.fastmail.com \
--to=andrew@aj.id.au \
--cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
--cc=hongweiz@ami.com \
--cc=joel@jms.id.au \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).