From: Ivan Mikhaylov <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: Alexandre Belloni <email@example.com>,
Milton Miller II <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Cc: Paul Fertser <email@example.com>,
Alessandro Zummo <firstname.lastname@example.org>,
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] rtc: pch-rtc: add Intel Series PCH built-in read-only RTC
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 02:52:55 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <email@example.com> (raw)
On Mon, 2021-08-30 at 14:56 +0300, Ivan Mikhaylov wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-08-17 at 22:05 +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > On 17/08/2021 18:04:09+0000, Milton Miller II wrote:
> > >
> > > On Aug 16, 2021, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > > > On 15/08/2021 01:42:15+0300, Paul Fertser wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 06:44:34PM +0300, Ivan Mikhaylov wrote:
> > > > > > Add RTC driver with dt binding tree document. Also this driver
> > > > adds one sysfs
> > > > > > attribute for host power control which I think is odd for RTC
> > > > driver.
> > > > > > Need I cut it off and use I2C_SLAVE_FORCE? I2C_SLAVE_FORCE is not
> > > > good
> > > > > > way too from my point of view. Is there any better approach?
> > > > >
> > > > > Reading the C620 datasheet I see this interface also allows other
> > > > > commands (wake up, watchdog feeding, reboot etc.) and reading
> > > > statuses
> > > > > (e.g Intruder Detect, POWER_OK_BAD).
> > > > >
> > > > > I think if there's any plan to use anything other but RTC via this
> > > > > interface then the driver should be registered as an MFD.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > This is not the current thinking, if everything is integrated, then
> > > > there is no issue registering a watchdog from the RTC driver. I'll
> > > > let
> > > > you check with Lee...
> > >
> > > I think the current statement is "if they are truly disjoint
> > > hardware controls" then an MFD might suffice, but if they require
> > > software cordination the new auxillary bus seems to be desired.
> > >
> > Honestly, the auxiliary bus doesn't provide anything that you can't do
> > by registering a device in multiple subsystem from a single driver.
> > (Lee Jones, Mark Brown and I did complain at the time that this was yet
> > another back channel for misuses).
> > > > > However, I'm not sure what is the correct interface for
> > > > poweroff/reboot
> > > > control.
> > >
> > > While there is a gpio interface to a simple regulator switch,
> > > the project to date has been asserting direct or indirect
> > > gpios etc to control the host. If these are events to
> > > trigger a change in state and not a direct state change
> > > that some controller trys to follow, maybe a message delivery
> > > model? (this is not to reboot or cycle the bmc).
> > >
> > > milton
> Alexandre, gentle reminder about this one series. I can get rid off from sysfs
> attribute and put it like RO rtc without any additional things for now as
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-14 23:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-10 15:44 [PATCH 0/2] rtc: pch-rtc: add Intel Series PCH built-in read-only RTC Ivan Mikhaylov
2021-08-10 15:44 ` [PATCH 1/2] rtc: pch-rtc: add RTC driver for Intel Series PCH Ivan Mikhaylov
2021-08-14 22:52 ` Paul Fertser
2021-08-20 12:34 ` Ivan Mikhaylov
2021-09-25 22:24 ` Alexandre Belloni
2021-08-10 15:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: rtc: provide RTC PCH device tree binding doc Ivan Mikhaylov
2021-08-14 22:42 ` [PATCH 0/2] rtc: pch-rtc: add Intel Series PCH built-in read-only RTC Paul Fertser
2021-08-14 23:22 ` Alexandre Belloni
2021-08-17 18:04 ` Milton Miller II
2021-08-17 20:05 ` Alexandre Belloni
2021-08-30 11:56 ` Ivan Mikhaylov
2021-09-14 23:52 ` Ivan Mikhaylov [this message]
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).