From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64183C433EF for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 02:49:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8EF9610CB for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 02:49:42 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org C8EF9610CB Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4HpCBD6VRGz2ypT for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 13:49:40 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 header.b=MpFq3C/Y; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=google.com (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::531; helo=mail-pg1-x531.google.com; envelope-from=suichen@google.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 header.b=MpFq3C/Y; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-pg1-x531.google.com (mail-pg1-x531.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::531]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HpC9P1WBSz2xWd for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 13:48:54 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x531.google.com with SMTP id q126so13112595pgq.13 for ; Mon, 08 Nov 2021 18:48:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=axRAMEmTmSMcYfL3WAtS2oozXz72qWyBxcxKMr/zmYQ=; b=MpFq3C/Yxhy0cw7J6zymgZbAPPMakEijuJ3gcE/H0vJu15VM4Z8mCCAOEXX3zhiSMW Eb6t4JVquux5Wns6hjO8mvEa+eZC0InqWOre+pSPmBwp76A6jelFa3+BAfLZFKKzfrme 4/MnAOmmeULE1zJwS5rHJUdDVIW5JkHXeE3n74S09CzUdI7yEyf0IMOTHcAbdGqUbg3l 0xAKba+8voD3cA4wp6ipynnWejwLVw8Hl/oQYbwnpPA64I8GMcwdgVkpz8Mt3HpSN7Jh oz+ZDB/n5Y8zdOWQRVdq5pKtRmMs1OgqL0LqHkRxvIlksjH446m6KQkNQuWtcFKmV9kX Smqw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=axRAMEmTmSMcYfL3WAtS2oozXz72qWyBxcxKMr/zmYQ=; b=7evNELg4qjLWRITZabhBJm6ahMTdn4nu/QYDF45ONnUDNY7fsBNYuD2iZ7KTTPW0ML CNKF46198KVauvT3CctRjSTn+D1BLgFCwSGi5MebA3tanpUgxKPx4z1LFjpTYjZL+kmP wsdjBh42eMWvJBMf/YRxA/lBWeBPgJLd1jDiykqnh/WSWuTcBqaC1o+ztKTIMPpSGeyp /4AfNYVBWeYZ4wwd2KCgB0phMEat1r2zTj5+usR2tUJEl5eM2BSBi7UBVY9Bxz91kCf1 hPJLltRsnfXOrdsYF6a/ETVRBZcmQoRn5cJ2/JVD7qYiCAwpW1/2pcyrDvgLhcEy53rb uGVg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531EattAKwb5lH9vfzmaSbijXxzZpXqadsmkHOcHAlQUs6nxHvlB MIc1JBDObt+/ElOoq0fdGvdxodf5Q/7uDJoT X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwSetNgrM1u2ECwxaOf7ssOc9sP62iXyCr5izCZ8Y4/cwQLJU1wvgAGE1IDJN8aoCETPHxy4g== X-Received: by 2002:a62:3387:0:b0:44d:7ec:906a with SMTP id z129-20020a623387000000b0044d07ec906amr87312856pfz.69.1636426130993; Mon, 08 Nov 2021 18:48:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from [100.115.92.196] (c-73-189-176-14.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [73.189.176.14]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w129sm12500044pfd.61.2021.11.08.18.48.49 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 08 Nov 2021 18:48:50 -0800 (PST) Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IOWbnuimhjogW3Bob3NwaG9yLWhvc3QtaXBtaWRdIFF1ZXN0aW9u?= =?UTF-8?Q?_about_IPMI_SDR?= To: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org References: From: Sui Chen Message-ID: <91c35372-7329-a80c-8be0-3e9d79251fdc@google.com> Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 18:48:47 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: openbmc-bounces+openbmc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "openbmc" On 11/8/21 3:37 AM, Chris Chen (TPI) wrote: > Hi all, > > I think I figured out the error message is due to the > phosphor-health-monitor package. The phosphor-health-monitor doesn't > have the interface of org.freedesktop.DBus.ObjectManager and with the > GetManagedObjects method call, so the getSensorMap() in the > intel-ipmi-oem would be failed. Thanks for catching this, it seems there exists a change to make phosphor-health-monitor compatible with `ipmitool sdr`: https://gerrit.openbmc-project.xyz/c/openbmc/phosphor-health-monitor/+/41228 > 1. > is it only for monitoring CPU and memory sensor values?  it looks > like there is no explanation of it is in the phosphor-health-monitor > repo. Yes it is for monitoring the BMC's CPU, memory and storage usage, and other metrics. > 2. > can I remove it? If yes, will I miss any features? Yes it is safe to remove, there are plans to use phosphor-health-monitor sensors in Redfish but the Schemas and bmcweb-side changes are still in progress, so you won't miss too many features for now.