From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59DCEC4338F for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 19:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C41060E76 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 19:33:46 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 2C41060E76 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=tanous.net Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4GpPV02yMRz30B4 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 05:33:44 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=tanous-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@tanous-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20150623 header.b=GwbcZ8Hb; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=tanous.net (client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::232; helo=mail-lj1-x232.google.com; envelope-from=ed@tanous.net; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=tanous-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@tanous-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20150623 header.b=GwbcZ8Hb; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-lj1-x232.google.com (mail-lj1-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::232]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GpPT94TjKz2yWN for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 05:32:59 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-lj1-x232.google.com with SMTP id a7so28890491ljq.11 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 12:32:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tanous-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=/s3WHfeRzAGK+lRFx2ucyGlYSF4fDWDdRGWNyzH+vqE=; b=GwbcZ8HbY8eDmQdjNJX39qiKdgpFWr0XiJPxMBWFWjB/dtpSqeaKQCzQNqg84ZZQST N0XHOrbVDA/1Au6YOntaQH+b6UGPiB7sxM3QeGmSmsbAV0QDFlknHqxEaeCof2jHLzZS SKQ8yZbg602LYRoERiw6+fDplRj6OUp5zZKTdKewyHPxaATXD8dtxTOnhiwASmlJkoBz y4m0hfMbQJKekVA9DpYnumxCQbVzr9FpvsUONnQrVZseXjddyAnH8CIdudVHtxMo51Es 7UpKu8t0XOSjKf9ThFpGkYIHplYeVvDZ3pABORxE+aeWzqrE2RJKKf5R6zxC4DebwNkO aHaA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/s3WHfeRzAGK+lRFx2ucyGlYSF4fDWDdRGWNyzH+vqE=; b=dXPF0UP94ZRw5ctbnmfI2PMIRBRSDe5rhRfLtWvNnjmPIb9iLejcP/jaojMtXw8kIt pUdOA58jFcIqV9At4sNCZxb/EZWqAnhNym0QPfj6f6YMn3fTi5Mor32gzq/KoPeb+aSo qy9TdI76VRt8qbOERv/ryKXFv36sz7Zf11Cww6VmeDBoXeLb8yk3cXKs2OaBD406SSel gAbiF90QF8GZTgIgA7ft+t3VFvlivxa9teu6xB5H8miA9dOxN0X3hOLEvp0RSMlLwF+K droAHs8rJOiO6TN4FlQTpIDNO2W0HwvPHYY5wyX9GtLB2L6TlX7zBSgO+drmRLAMJxP0 q4jQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532teSeuMVsOZXwVGw9DA0mxCVg64i2yNnSWNfvyra2vO5N4bpSO 3LcNAaLQBXpUkdUqpDe9hmzx8NRftOtPLvXjTQvxVg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw6AvFhlj6WkDrycEjVy1K5/tfK0rwRhfe1PQgP4KLb/24sD6R47/JZvSIVxJo6TBFK7dlV4Kza1zmYFT+HjIE= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a4db:: with SMTP id p27mr180183ljm.161.1629142369594; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 12:32:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Ed Tanous Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 12:32:38 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Creating Hard Shutdown interfaces/alarm for NIC Sensor To: Patrick Williams Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Zhikui Ren , Jae Hyun Yoo , Andrew Jeffery , OpenBMC Maillist , Jayashree D , Amithash Prasad , Kumar Thangavel , "Velumani T-ERS, HCLTech" Errors-To: openbmc-bounces+openbmc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "openbmc" On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 11:54 AM Patrick Williams wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 09:27:58PM +0530, Kumar Thangavel wrote: > > Gentle Reminder. Any suggestions/idea on this. > > Hi Kumar, > > Can you frame your original email with a question? > > I'm not versed in the details here enough to know what you're underlying > concern is. When I read the email I see mostly a list of "facts". > > I suspect others are similarly not responding because they don't know what you > want to know or where your doubts are. I wasn't responding because there's been several discussions on almost this exact use case, as well as patchsets to add the new types and interfaces. To reiterate Patricks comment, I was hoping you'd search for them and either jump into those discussions where the work is being done, or propose some more pointed questions once you got more versed on what already exists along those lines. > > -- > Patrick Williams