openbmc.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* IPMI Adopter's agreement
@ 2018-06-20 16:32 Alexander Amelkin
  2018-06-26 18:49 ` James Mihm
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Amelkin @ 2018-06-20 16:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: OpenBMC Maillist


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 234 bytes --]

Just wondering, does OpenBMC / TLF have this fine document signed?

https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/servers/ipmi/ipmi-home.html/#adopters

Or does each vendor need to sign this separately?


Sincerely,
Alexander.



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: IPMI Adopter's agreement
  2018-06-20 16:32 IPMI Adopter's agreement Alexander Amelkin
@ 2018-06-26 18:49 ` James Mihm
  2018-11-19 12:35   ` Alexander Amelkin
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: James Mihm @ 2018-06-26 18:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: a.amelkin; +Cc: openbmc

I'm looking into how we need to proceed regarding this question
internally here at Intel.

James.
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 9:33 AM Alexander Amelkin <a.amelkin@yadro.com> wrote:
>
> Just wondering, does OpenBMC / TLF have this fine document signed?
>
> https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/servers/ipmi/ipmi-home.html/#adopters
>
> Or does each vendor need to sign this separately?
>
>
> Sincerely,
> Alexander.
>
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: IPMI Adopter's agreement
  2018-06-26 18:49 ` James Mihm
@ 2018-11-19 12:35   ` Alexander Amelkin
  2018-11-20 17:42     ` James Mihm
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Amelkin @ 2018-11-19 12:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: James Mihm; +Cc: openbmc


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 522 bytes --]

Any further info on this?

26.06.2018 21:49, James Mihm wrote:
> I'm looking into how we need to proceed regarding this question
> internally here at Intel.
>
> James.
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 9:33 AM Alexander Amelkin <a.amelkin@yadro.com> wrote:
>> Just wondering, does OpenBMC / TLF have this fine document signed?
>>
>> https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/servers/ipmi/ipmi-home.html/#adopters
>>
>> Or does each vendor need to sign this separately?
>>
>>
>> Sincerely,
>> Alexander.
>>
>>



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: IPMI Adopter's agreement
  2018-11-19 12:35   ` Alexander Amelkin
@ 2018-11-20 17:42     ` James Mihm
  2018-11-23 11:38       ` New IPMI spec (Was: IPMI Adopter's agreement) Alexander Amelkin
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: James Mihm @ 2018-11-20 17:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: a.amelkin; +Cc: openbmc

I've refreshed my question internally, and expect to get a response next week.
The person is out of the office until next week.

James.On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 4:35 AM Alexander Amelkin
<a.amelkin@yadro.com> wrote:
>
> Any further info on this?
>
> 26.06.2018 21:49, James Mihm wrote:
> > I'm looking into how we need to proceed regarding this question
> > internally here at Intel.
> >
> > James.
> > On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 9:33 AM Alexander Amelkin <a.amelkin@yadro.com> wrote:
> >> Just wondering, does OpenBMC / TLF have this fine document signed?
> >>
> >> https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/servers/ipmi/ipmi-home.html/#adopters
> >>
> >> Or does each vendor need to sign this separately?
> >>
> >>
> >> Sincerely,
> >> Alexander.
> >>
> >>
>
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* New IPMI spec (Was: IPMI Adopter's agreement)
  2018-11-20 17:42     ` James Mihm
@ 2018-11-23 11:38       ` Alexander Amelkin
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Amelkin @ 2018-11-23 11:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: James Mihm; +Cc: openbmc


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1088 bytes --]

James, do you by any chance know if there is any work in progress on a newer IPMI specification or is it a deprecated standard and will not be updated? I'm asking mostly because of https://github.com/openbmc/openbmc/issues/3417

Thank you.
Alexander.

20.11.2018 20:42, James Mihm wrote:
> I've refreshed my question internally, and expect to get a response next week.
> The person is out of the office until next week.
>
> James.On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 4:35 AM Alexander Amelkin
> <a.amelkin@yadro.com> wrote:
>> Any further info on this?
>>
>> 26.06.2018 21:49, James Mihm wrote:
>>> I'm looking into how we need to proceed regarding this question
>>> internally here at Intel.
>>>
>>> James.
>>> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 9:33 AM Alexander Amelkin <a.amelkin@yadro.com> wrote:
>>>> Just wondering, does OpenBMC / TLF have this fine document signed?
>>>>
>>>> https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/servers/ipmi/ipmi-home.html/#adopters
>>>>
>>>> Or does each vendor need to sign this separately?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sincerely,
>>>> Alexander.
>>>>
>>>>
>>



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2018-11-23 11:38 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-06-20 16:32 IPMI Adopter's agreement Alexander Amelkin
2018-06-26 18:49 ` James Mihm
2018-11-19 12:35   ` Alexander Amelkin
2018-11-20 17:42     ` James Mihm
2018-11-23 11:38       ` New IPMI spec (Was: IPMI Adopter's agreement) Alexander Amelkin

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).