openbmc.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lei Yu <yulei.sh@bytedance.com>
To: Ed Tanous <edtanous@google.com>
Cc: openbmc <openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	Thang Nguyen <thang@amperemail.onmicrosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [External] Re: New test for patches in openbmc/openbmc
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 16:36:25 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGm54UF82Xx_N0g2d0sOx8Yt0vZ--+eAk18cS_68nt2RPoL=pA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAH2-KxBpQbmBAedd63-1KORd9Z81D-gWM7oqQPU05Q=4S5XYzQ@mail.gmail.com>

> > I have a similar case.
> > As an x86 system, some of the recipes/changes are referenced from
> > Intel-BMC, which is not upstreamed.
> > Currently, we had patches related to UART routing and
> > phosphor-node-manager-proxy.
> > The UART routing patches are being upstreamed thanks to Troy.
> > The change to node-manager is related to the HW design difference, and
> > due to the fact that phosphor-node-manager-proxy is in Intel-BMC, we
> > can not really make the patch upstream.
>
> I'm not following why that's preventing upstreaming.  If
> node-manager-proxy is something you need on your systems, I don't see
> a reason why we would avoid cleaning it up and upstreaming it, but I
> have no details on what this patch is, or what it does, so it's really
> hard to talk in concrete terms about how to proceed next.

node-manager-proxy is in Intel-BMC, so we really need Intel to
upstream it into openbmc.

-- 
BRs,
Lei YU

  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-28  8:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-21 22:35 New test for patches in openbmc/openbmc Ed Tanous
2021-09-22  9:02 ` Alexander Amelkin
2021-09-22 13:15   ` Verdun, Jean-Marie
2021-09-22 23:35   ` Oskar Senft
2021-09-23  2:49     ` John Broadbent
2021-09-23 17:09       ` Benjamin Fair
2021-09-23 23:57       ` Ed Tanous
2021-09-23 23:38   ` Ed Tanous
2021-09-24 10:28     ` Thang Nguyen
2021-09-24 11:06       ` [External] " Lei Yu
2021-09-27 16:33         ` Ed Tanous
2021-09-28  8:36           ` Lei Yu [this message]
2021-10-08  8:32             ` Lei YU
2021-10-08 17:35               ` Ed Tanous
2021-10-09  2:18                 ` Lei Yu
2021-10-11 17:47                   ` Ed Tanous
2021-09-27 16:39       ` Ed Tanous

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAGm54UF82Xx_N0g2d0sOx8Yt0vZ--+eAk18cS_68nt2RPoL=pA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=yulei.sh@bytedance.com \
    --cc=edtanous@google.com \
    --cc=openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=thang@amperemail.onmicrosoft.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).