From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0F48C433EF for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 08:37:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9D3D611BD for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 08:37:38 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org E9D3D611BD Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=bytedance.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4HJXv549zkz2yPF for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 18:37:37 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=bytedance-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com header.i=@bytedance-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 header.b=ii66gVhi; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=bytedance.com (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::22a; helo=mail-oi1-x22a.google.com; envelope-from=yulei.sh@bytedance.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=bytedance-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com header.i=@bytedance-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 header.b=ii66gVhi; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-oi1-x22a.google.com (mail-oi1-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HJXtH1wWgz2xrg for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 18:36:50 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-oi1-x22a.google.com with SMTP id z11so29125231oih.1 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 01:36:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bytedance-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=R/Po6qW4x+IJhpP+bKPahp2cfjRUvQodMGD+0/oKzVA=; b=ii66gVhitzeWxAwEAvxNwklqcNcJS56ns7pK27uMDJRwihiCPth9zFz37IQgunj7oh +2Qwn2aBg9v9o3PUyx2mqumII3kOkey9EPwrjqUqMUpwGmvx4lu2KLhbgnGg9Qt3vW34 A3B+5SEefDEiIR6XIkpx1rK+M8QWOqqzaJue/hCC5EKNdphHJVTze2uA4yMHrBHxstd3 6b/fkH91V4TX3ApvcV3VE54ewMw2nhuToVq2oHwp+nn0UUy9sby1wD9kgAZCbN4jUKyP 5jBNhAG80ra3Eg5Bo2ZW0VBeXU5iJ+ONhHn98VhYYCGDtQ0JC1D7a+1WYfS8XWs0Zk69 VqMA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=R/Po6qW4x+IJhpP+bKPahp2cfjRUvQodMGD+0/oKzVA=; b=L/HHQqPXiR/sVIg4Afc5RvAOlRIralOAu+k5RqZXY5uvPgq59bVYCm5B42fKFJ7K6c ERS4px1oURnN4qMOFJ/eOHhLkqFigPnYTxAclWViB2TLc8Jq1l2Jce42B+cf8HFVc85T NPdiuBuJlW+9xkHtUBzt7NrjvKA2fUi3NQ6szbdSSsbZuTmUSYGNMC/rqoYYutizK2B0 t7AnPmfOmF+b9NVTrYLcVBj6cM4vG3hntvzYIJNpRPtW8vJX31W6AmZrQEeI2S5hcRxb Vg/LLyr34ga/56jUlU4srq0S+SQfQv2uQTFZX8Coi1xPjqbzk0O04ThvvQEdtk791Z2D JElg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533N+8P7UxcG2exg8F45omCfvOujc7rij0siUORJCL5bJjoNb8iu DFd+dtmDgp1USZhSsrGJ5FmRRz9VE9pC+J4KICneGcidV0tfNI97 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJySQg4LxxOVc1HX2fl478Ktu5klwsWfZ7e0rhZ1Ukb4UiHLlN5UiT6DCJaseCR1GxRKcwKNk3+Xb4WKPwZr2Pk= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:e8e:: with SMTP id k14mr2751499oil.28.1632818196580; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 01:36:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <67dbec1b-8598-8814-e85e-848b2eb123cf@yadro.com>

In-Reply-To: From: Lei Yu Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 16:36:25 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [External] Re: New test for patches in openbmc/openbmc To: Ed Tanous Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: openbmc , Thang Nguyen Errors-To: openbmc-bounces+openbmc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "openbmc" > > I have a similar case. > > As an x86 system, some of the recipes/changes are referenced from > > Intel-BMC, which is not upstreamed. > > Currently, we had patches related to UART routing and > > phosphor-node-manager-proxy. > > The UART routing patches are being upstreamed thanks to Troy. > > The change to node-manager is related to the HW design difference, and > > due to the fact that phosphor-node-manager-proxy is in Intel-BMC, we > > can not really make the patch upstream. > > I'm not following why that's preventing upstreaming. If > node-manager-proxy is something you need on your systems, I don't see > a reason why we would avoid cleaning it up and upstreaming it, but I > have no details on what this patch is, or what it does, so it's really > hard to talk in concrete terms about how to proceed next. node-manager-proxy is in Intel-BMC, so we really need Intel to upstream it into openbmc. -- BRs, Lei YU