From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EEFDC47083 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 15:19:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 055F4613BF for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 15:19:58 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 055F4613BF Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=openbmc-bounces+openbmc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FwCPp0dPzz2ymN for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2021 01:19:58 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20161025 header.b=Omrw6MEc; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=google.com (client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::334; helo=mail-wm1-x334.google.com; envelope-from=edtanous@google.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20161025 header.b=Omrw6MEc; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-wm1-x334.google.com (mail-wm1-x334.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::334]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FwCPL4TFHz2xb2 for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2021 01:19:34 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-wm1-x334.google.com with SMTP id f17so1552261wmf.2 for ; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 08:19:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=wb890aMD7QrSQfJCebhEJ1MFeFFN55U7id/XxBcDjtA=; b=Omrw6MEcLYP7KxAHGKEmHmYHoY+a3RggGkMVo6FN8aym1Ggz5nOAv2MyNT0h3SV6TK J/9ebr+GIomFsgAZFy5F2TvfFQvhCTw8deBBZGJlxRgYku1Mf4n1egHOsYBwWroCkr9K 1trAOBdP8iNpL7yVW1w94iV80vXCEEuy2tNcXqBhs4oirCshtrPfvgZKO5l9unccGRCW jI47T+1gH7sjgNKCwbW+GXO8WtwgIalIK9SxmrOnp23j4CD/HkNGwxTxJLdzWnYyMj+r Z5mtnpg4nzBOEDvW3hMjYytoAb9FaN99yh7mSpubdl26VQJCLeIMb6L2g70eV2DH7yfB yb0w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=wb890aMD7QrSQfJCebhEJ1MFeFFN55U7id/XxBcDjtA=; b=CZL9th98cpHVeyAWABSQXWhyGNib0XaJdR4oz9ZzhS8OV3JRMabe2PrtniIKa7Mgha 6ECpF4q1CO2cFJeKpWFkmNQTg31N5g7lkH1jihu/1T1uRaohZMk3l5kK0yzwrBU+ScZ5 HEqQ37WVT1H/1eEVfmORWyMaraA2ERVDldZA92pFWQlrAeUmRRzt196KvGpzwxVd9+F1 awlCC1ERvZl/9dSBWO7Z9JkMn/jTb9rnsZ/fezSR6DJA11ajH75YEcY2aZfJOT4/GBXm IHqeyQ3IS1pF+3t2SsOx9Aa5bmBeYBKHmI/irDLhI8gX6/cpncGyOyXbrkbvAwCqtP8T vIYQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532orrVMpNrn56kIvEROT9ITaYQskYsjSjv14ebGVawQmvHnMzZA Up0pCYYL9bqdI5A0xZqTCTO8S+OEpKiXzWDg3jmflw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwopMYk4jxnFuuV6HwAndlcUv9ZyptelWaQ0JoBZ2jua635ApOdSYOu+Ahv2jsR6bg34mO85no8k1QBBHqY3GM= X-Received: by 2002:a1c:453:: with SMTP id 80mr4046428wme.171.1622647170612; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 08:19:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <8b3c88c2-cc9f-3ebe-2e4d-61974ae27519@linux.ibm.com> <30dde28a-38ff-6c59-57f4-23ed3fb46130@linux.ibm.com>

<84217f2a-8351-48e9-964c-de34f4496c67@www.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: <84217f2a-8351-48e9-964c-de34f4496c67@www.fastmail.com> From: Ed Tanous Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 08:19:23 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Security Working Group - Wednesday May 26 - results To: Andrew Jeffery Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: openbmc , Joseph Reynolds Errors-To: openbmc-bounces+openbmc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "openbmc" On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 8:10 PM Andrew Jeffery wrote: > > > > On Fri, 28 May 2021, at 00:34, Joseph Reynolds wrote: > > On 5/27/21 7:56 AM, Patrick Williams wrote: > > > On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 01:59:57PM -0500, Joseph Reynolds wrote: > > >> On 5/26/21 8:43 AM, Joseph Reynolds wrote: > > > > > >>> 1. Followup from last meeting re uboot, kexec, sysrq-trigger on ARM > > >>> architecture. > > >> We re-hashed the discussion, added new information, and added new concerns. > > > Could you paste the minutes here when you reply to these? It is kind of > > > hard to have any discussion with the rest of the community when you have > > > 2-3 levels of indirection to get at the words. > > > > Thanks for your email! > > > > Yes, I've waffled between cut/paste of the minutes and summarizing > > them. I prefer to cut/paste, so I'll do that consistently from now on. > > +1, it makes it much easier for people who can't attend to provide input. > > The other thing I'd like to see is attendance / attribution of > comments, that way I know who I need discuss particular items with. +1 > > Cheers, > > Andrew