archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Deepak Kodihalli <>
To: Ed Tanous <>
Cc: "Garrett, Mike \(HPE Server Firmware\)" <>,
	OpenBMC Maillist <>
Subject: Re: RDE Enablement
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 14:04:14 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

Hi All,

On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 2:02 AM Ed Tanous <> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 1:26 PM Garrett, Mike (HPE Server Firmware)
> <> wrote:
> >
> > Greetings,
> >
> > I'm am interested to know if there has been any organized discussion or development on Redfish Device Enablement (RDE - DMTF DSP0218) for moving encoded Redfish data across PLDM/MCTP interfaces.  We are interested in promoting this standard and are willing to lead a reference implementation for OpenBMC if there is not yet something in progress.  If there is something in progress, can you point me at the work because I would love to see it.
> We are interested in this as well, although we are in the early stages
> of looking into it.  Ideally we'd like to have OpenBMC support add in
> cards (NICs, Accelerators, ect) that supported this functionality, and
> make that data available to the normal OpenBMC channels
> (Redfish/ipmi/ect).

I had a couple of questions on RDE, and I wonder if this has crossed
your mind as you started looking at RDE, or if this is
misunderstanding on my part:

1) I understand the problem RDE tries to solve in terms of avoiding
having device-specific knowledge/code on the BMC, but doesn't PLDM
also solve a similar problem? For example, if a device supported PLDM
Type 2 (and other PLDM specs such as the one for FRU, etc), the BMC
could convert PLDM to Redfish. I understand this may not be as
convenient as RDE but it still solves the device-specific code
problem, PLDM being a standard protocol as well. Am I missing
something here? Is it just that RDE is more convenient than PLDM to
Redfish conversion, or is there more to it - for example, PLDM
can't/isn't intended to be converted to Redfish, in an
effective/lossless way?

2) Is RDE specific to a class of devices? Some of the documents I see
stress on I/O adapters. Would be it odd to implement RDE on devices
like Accelerators, CPU, etc?


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-07-21  8:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-10 20:26 Garrett, Mike (HPE Server Firmware)
2021-06-10 20:32 ` Ed Tanous
2021-06-10 20:59   ` Garrett, Mike (HPE Server Firmware)
2021-06-10 23:06     ` Andrew Jeffery
2021-06-11  6:53     ` Deepak Kodihalli
2021-06-11 13:31       ` Garrett, Mike (HPE Server Firmware)
2021-08-09 13:50       ` Garrett, Mike (HPE Server Firmware)
2021-07-21 14:16     ` Ed Tanous
2021-07-21  8:34   ` Deepak Kodihalli [this message]
2021-07-21 14:23     ` Ed Tanous
2021-07-26 13:53       ` Garrett, Mike (HPE Server Firmware)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='' \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: RDE Enablement' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).