From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95B54C4338F for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 09:15:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10C1960F57 for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 09:15:06 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 10C1960F57 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4GmHvY55ndz3cJg for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 19:15:05 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20161025 header.b=qkxw1h4v; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::f44; helo=mail-qv1-xf44.google.com; envelope-from=liuxiwei1013@gmail.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20161025 header.b=qkxw1h4v; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-qv1-xf44.google.com (mail-qv1-xf44.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f44]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GmHtn6nqtz2yxP for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 19:14:24 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-qv1-xf44.google.com with SMTP id bl13so4844421qvb.5 for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 02:14:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=NUNjenaFw3r/7T8HezUSZlsy+QZfgG1auKnxQ8X834g=; b=qkxw1h4vgZJAEcIwLPCDaEHRndd4nlguYpZe+l7PuS9FxTefEXyvphvjWKZuLW1RXG qziDvIzOvhbIBkzp/tVhnF1aKZP5A0s9PLFX6FaMTNe/kP+8j1cB8Nb84m19uiV9KMSd BYj4QPsmbpRCnL7WPkrP0ZTBp+j6UL4vg8XSbWGDit3ROgETy+t+/d7o/VCbrtG5FoFj voXFqJEt0px9dbpD9uCNXSFvBIpDcOsee1n4eQS62yaqTiy5UWR4zpEZdChgvv0iZHF0 m+5786iY9mPEUamCro9WTctReI2h26xMt+rTXkHusuoe4HQ7wUNBzdHA9slp67AGO8+h tkgg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=NUNjenaFw3r/7T8HezUSZlsy+QZfgG1auKnxQ8X834g=; b=D+KxpepRXcf/9fZnsJ39VHb482AZp0wXwkn1Ark8Ta3C4dz8FfxUGv9LayDfiOAquW GUW58Bk8MiktjUBZ5I8lUV1HhS2PwGNQM0kgbzb07P58rfZieCXCZ1Ak+f+iaZcNHYy4 89hJ1x2TcZMsw/OYbj4hTUQg5IIAPv8gdJATajnvrvPLRYPNn47TRYXsVNxHzEYBCxgc j3LtFNRvSOZb/2PEokOn1tUOxoWBhtMdQRkX3D85FekUfQy2D6FCW0/8y5US6KO29Fzg aGCO5F1t5jNMKuV33VSKDE9DxX60+YfeCxU9NbsovLWojGwjS0eB7SsEPlSsVBohfVma IIgg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532BY/7MOLjVDYYyWBJc0TjE3zUUbLHW10Kl4gNBCN+/IddHh0iQ DBDukoBrxgKP3zdq44rgHKZKm4VTLEdlaBv5UmY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzFYVkHUBX5V1zMLcUl4Mc/VPqmeHj2l5qJD7iUaswS8BXL3txBlwwkWRAmUDrRfTGbZuGrskl2z3dlRs4JMA4= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:18ec:: with SMTP id ep12mr1692351qvb.51.1628846061000; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 02:14:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <916fc23f02ec749ecccf70dff356daa400026b28.camel@yadro.com> In-Reply-To: <916fc23f02ec749ecccf70dff356daa400026b28.camel@yadro.com> From: George Liu Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2021 17:14:10 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Request new repo for Audit function To: Ivan Mikhaylov Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: OpenBMC Maillist , Brad Bishop Errors-To: openbmc-bounces+openbmc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "openbmc" On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 4:31 PM Ivan Mikhaylov wrote: > > On Fri, 2021-08-13 at 14:09 +0800, George Liu wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 11:22 AM Milton Miller II wrote: > > > > > > > > > Reply below > > > > > > -------- Original Message -------- > > > From: George Liu > > > Date: Thu, August 12, 2021 7:52 PM -0500 > > > > > > > > > Hi Brad: > > > > > > We have a requirement to implement an Audit function, I found that > > > there is a design doc[1], but there is no code to implement it. > > > > > > Could you create a new repo for Audit function? > > > eg: phosphor-audit > > > > > > [1]: https://github.com/openbmc/docs/blob/master/designs/phosphor-audit.md > > > > > > thx - George Liu > > > > > > -------- End of Original Message -------- > > > > > > Hi George. > > > > > > > > > Please update the design with consideration for inclusive naming[2] before > > > submitting code for it, as it uses depreciated terminology in it's external > > > control interface. > > > > > > I see this design was merged almost 2 years ago before this policy was in > > > place but as you said it hasn't been exposed by the community yet so we won't > > > need to maintain compatibility with prior implementations. > > > > Thanks for your advice. > > I will read and update this design doc ASAP :) > > > > > > > > > > > [2] > > > https://github.com/openbmc/docs/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#inclusive-naming > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Milton > > > > > > > > George, there is answer about same question in this thread > https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/openbmc/2020-March/020839.html . > Should be part of phosphor-logging. Okay, Let me check, thanks so much > > Thanks. >